Biting The Hand That Fed Them – And Winning

Carlton Fields
Contact

Choice of law is frequently a prominent – and sometimes a pivotal – factor in a court’s analysis of whether to grant or deny certification of a nationwide or multi-state class.

Whether a federal court may apply one state’s law to the claims asserted by the class rather than the law of each class member’s state of domicile can significantly affect the court’s evaluation of both the predominance and manageability tests set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).

Originally published in Bloomberg BNA's Class Action Litigation Report - February 12, 2016.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Carlton Fields on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide