Claim Terms Are Construed In Antifungal Drug Case

Morris James LLP
Contact

Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 15-438-LPS, December 27, 2016.

Stark, C. J. Claim construction opinion issues regarding seven terms from one patent.  A Markman hearing took place on October 24, 2016.

The disputed technology relates to pharmaceutical compositions for poorly soluble, antifungal drugs.  The following terms were considered:

  1. “consisting essentially of”
  2. “wherein in vivo the composition provides a mean CMAX of at least 100 ng/ml, after administration in the fasted state”
  3. “wherein in vivo the composition provides a mean AUC of at least 800 ng.h/ml, after administration in the fasted state”
  4. “in vivo”
  5. “pharmaceutical composition”
  6. “azole antifungal drug”
  7. “polymer having acidic functional groups”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide