Partial Final Judgment Is Certified For Appeal

Morris James LLP
Contact

Interdigital Communications, Inc., et al. v. ZTE Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 13-009-RGA, June 7, 2016.

Andrews, J. Defendants’ motion for certification of partial final judgment under Rule 54(b) is granted.

A jury found two “power ramp-up” patents and one more of the four patents-in-suit valid and infringed.  Defendant moves to certify an appeal of the “power ramp-up” patents and plaintiffs oppose that motion. Entry of judgment as to patent infringement liability when only a damages trial remains is a final judgment with respect to Rule 54(b).The court finds that there is no overlap between the “power ramp-up” patent claims and the claims of the remaining patent-in-suit, weighing in favor of certification. The fact that appellate review will not be mooted by future developments in the district court also favors certification.  There does not appear to be any possibility that a reviewing court might be obliged to review the same issue a second time.  The expense of a costly damages trial may be avoided if an appeal is taken now.  The court certifies the partial final judgment.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide