Q1 Biometric Privacy Litigation Update

Blank Rome LLP
Contact

Blank Rome LLP

In the first quarter of 2022, there have already been significant legal developments in the biometric technology space. Most notably, the Illinois Supreme Court—which has actively taken Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (“BIPA”) cases amid the surge of such class action litigation in federal and state courts—issued several consequential BIPA opinions this year. Though 2022’s most critical BIPA decisions are likely still on the horizon.

BIPA Claims Not Barred by the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Law

On February 3, 2022, the Illinois Supreme Court held the Workers’ Compensation Act does not preempt statutory damage claims under BIPA in a long-awaited decision affirming that employee-related BIPA claims may remain in Illinois courts. McDonald v. Symphony Bronzeville Park, LLC, 2022 IL 126511.

The McDonald Court held claims for liquidated damages for collection of biometric data in violation of BIPA do not qualify as a workplace injury that occurred on the job—such that it would be subject to the Workers’ Compensation Act. A significant number of BIPA suits by employees had been paused pending the Court’s preemption ruling. Those cases are now set to proceed. The ruling also emphasizes the need for companies using biometric information in the employment context to put in place a compliance program meeting BIPA requirements or risk significant liability for violations.

Illinois Supreme Court: Claim Accrual / Statute of Limitations Decisions Forthcoming

While McDonald decided a significant issue impacting employment-related BIPA claims, also on the Illinois Supreme Court’s docket are critical cases implicating claim accrual and statute of limitations questions that will dramatically impact BIPA cases of all kinds.

Significantly, in Cothron v. White Castle Systems, Inc., on a certified question from the Seventh Circuit, the Illinois Supreme Court is set to decide whether a BIPA violation accrues only upon the first collection of an individual’s biometric identifiers or each time a biometric information is scanned. This upcoming decision may have massive implications under the statute, which authorizes damages “per violation.” In yet another forthcoming decision, the Illinois Supreme Court in Tims v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc., will provide definitive guidance to the hotly contested and open issue of the applicable statutes of limitation period for BIPA claims.

The Illinois Supreme Court has not hesitated to take up and decide hot-button BIPA issues; it is poised to continue to alter the BIPA landscape in 2022.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Blank Rome LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Blank Rome LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Blank Rome LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide