The Federal OSHA Vaccinate or Test ETS is Enforceable…For Now

Woodruff Sawyer
Contact

Woodruff Sawyer

On Friday December 17th the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals removed the stay on the Federal OSHA COVID ETS that requires employers with more than 100 employees to mandate vaccinations or require employees to produce a negative COVID test on a weekly basis. This clears the way for OSHA to start enforcing the mandate. Federal OSHA states on their ETS dedicated website that they intend to move enforcement dates out to allow employers additional time to come into compliance before they start to issue citations.

To account for any uncertainty created by the stay, OSHA is exercising enforcement discretion with respect to the compliance dates of the ETS. To provide employers with sufficient time to come into compliance, OSHA will not issue citations for noncompliance with any requirements of the ETS before January 10th and will not issue citations for noncompliance with the standard’s testing requirements before February 9th, so long as an employer is exercising reasonable, good faith efforts to come into compliance with the standard. OSHA will work closely with the regulated community to provide compliance assistance.

The legal battle over this standard is not over and it will likely end up in the Supreme Court, but in the meantime, employers will want to be sure they are ready, and that the earliest compliance deadline of January 10th is on their radar. The compliance deadline for actual testing will be February 9th.

Federal OSHA is also using the ETS as a proposal for a permanent standard. Part of issuing a permanent standard includes taking comments. OSHA has extended the deadline for comment on some portions of the rule until January 19th. Those wishing to provide comment can find links to do so on the ETS website, and you can find the standard number 1910.501 as well.

Highlights of the OSHA Vaccine Mandate ETS and Resources

A full summary of the 490-page register document is well beyond the scope of this regulatory update; we’ve provided some key highlights below, along with resources for your use in researching its requirements. A review of the documents found on the OSHA ETS page is recommended. OSHA has provided a summary, a fact sheet, an FAQ, a link to the regulation outline, and several other useful items on that page. The longer document (linked above) does provide some additional information on detailed items which may be relevant to your specific situation.

From a 20,000-foot view this ETS requires employers to either have all employees on site vaccinated or follow testing and masking protocols for those who are not vaccinated. Either way, a written plan is required. Whether secondary to accommodations from Title VII or the ADA or the employer chooses to offer the testing option, if unvaccinated employees are on site the testing and masking protocols must be followed. There is more to this topic and the accommodation process can affect masking and testing as well, so take a look at question set 3 in the FAQ for additional scenarios and details.

This ETS will not apply to those employers under some other regulations such as those for federal contractors, federal agencies, or for those employees specifically under the health care ETS. That said, it is possible to have some employees under separate regulations. Questions 2.G – 2.K in the FAQ address some of these in more detail and will help you decide which regulation your employees fall under.

The ETS was written in a way that extends what might be considered “benefits” to those who are vaccinated. That would include not having to test and not having to wear a mask. This is clearly not allowed by some jurisdictions so the ETS and local regulations may clash on this front. The local, more restrictive regulation prevails here.

The 100-employee threshold is defined and outlined in several scenarios, making it clear that the intent is a companywide count of employees at any point in time from November 5th until the ETS is no longer in force. If an employer hits the threshold even once, even for a day, during that time they must comply with the ETS.

Employees provided by a temporary company belong to the temporary company and fall under the temporary company’s count only. Multi-employer worksites are not considered all together but rather each employer maintains their own employee count. Part-time employees count toward your number. This is a true headcount, not a full-time employee (FTE) count. The FAQ provided on the OSHA ETS page outlines this in detail in a shorter format than the full document. See questions 2.A.1 – 2.K.

If an employer meets the threshold there are still some employees who may not meet the requirements to follow the ETS protections. Some of those requirements include workers who work exclusively outdoors and workers who do not report to the workplace and do not have contact with the public or customers as part of their work duties (exclusively work-from-home employees should qualify). These categories are defined in the standard and outlined in the FAQ in question set 2.

As you review the FAQ, summary, or other on the OSHA ETS page you will note that employees who do not have to follow the ETS protections still count toward the 100 employee threshold.

Written Policy and Vaccines

If you already have a written policy, what should you do?

This question is addressed in question 3.C. of the FAQ. You may need to add some things to your policy, or you may choose to take advantage of one of the two sample policies on the ETS page under the implementation title. If you hit the threshold, you will need a written policy and as of 11/5/21 you have 30 days to complete it.

The ETS requires the development of a roster tracking the vaccination status of all employees in the company whether fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, or unvaccinated. This roster is a medical record per this standard and must be protected just as other medical records. The same is true for testing records. The ETS does provide access to certain records (the employees’ own) to an employee or their representative or an aggregate number for comparison (no names) for the entire number of vaccinated employees vs. total employees on site. See question 4.D Also see questions 11.A and 11.B as they address information timeframe requests, which run from next business day for employees to as little as four hours if records are requested by OSHA.

Section 1910.1020 outlines an employment plus 30-year retention for records of this type. The ETS specifically allows for vaccination records and testing records to be disposed of after the ETS is no longer in effect. To find this reference, go to the register document and search the word “retention.”

The ETS requires employers to pay up to four hours of time for each initial vaccination dose (does not address boosters). See question set 5 for details around how this can and cannot be done as well as for an explanation of what OSHA considers a reasonable amount of sick leave time (and where that time can come from) for recovery from side effects.

Vaccine Side Effects

In general, for side effects an employer can require the employee to use sick time, but if they do not have sick leave available the employer cannot cause them to run into negative sick leave time to recover from side effects. A full review of this section is likely needed to fully understand when employers can require the use of leave time to be used.

COVID-19 Testing

Testing can be done in several ways but one way in which it cannot be done is probably the most important part of this section. “….An over-the-counter (OTC) antigen test may not be both self-administered and self-read unless observed by the employer or an authorized telehealth proctor.” This requirement takes a self-test and attestation approach out of play. The test type, confirmation and which test is considered the most accurate, as well as other details are outlined in question set 6 in the FAQ.

Payment for testing is not defined in the ETS, meaning that employees could be made to arrange and pay for their own tests if there is not a local law stating otherwise. The long document states this was done to encourage employees to get vaccinated. Many employers foresee a loss of employees if they utilize this route so have already chosen to provide the testing for employees using third parties or in-house testing options. The ETS leaves this decision in the hands of the employer.

Protective Measures

Other topics not addressed by the ETS include exclusion pay, barriers, handwashing, and other protective measures currently used by employers and written into some local plans and requirements. As with other regulations, this one does not preclude local regulations which are more stringent than the ETS itself. If you would like more information on these topics, go to question 7.D in the FAQ and in the main document, search the word “ventilation.” As of the morning of 11/5/21, the actual regulation outline was posted on the OSHA website under 1910.501.

This standard does have training and information requirements with it. Question set 9 in the FAQ addresses multiple training requirements, including information specific to the employers’ written policy elements, a CDC document on vaccine efficacy, anti-discrimination provisions around reporting from 1904.35 (English and Spanish fact sheets found at link within question 9A), and penalties for providing false information to OSHA from the OSH Act (English and Spanish fact sheets found at link within question 9A).

Written by:

Woodruff Sawyer
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Woodruff Sawyer on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide