The memorandum also addressed “frequently asked questions” for managing contractor performance anomalies during the pandemic. OMB noted that the FAR’s Excusable Delay clauses entitle contractors to schedule relief but not cost recovery, as we discussed last week. OMB nonetheless urged that agencies take a more equitable approach when presented with requests for both schedule and cost relief. According to OMB, Requests for Equitable Adjustment (REAs) “should be considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with existing agency practices, taking into account, among other factors, whether the requested costs would be allowable and reasonable to protect the health and safety of contract employees as part of the performance of the contract.” OMB cited the standards for determining cost reasonableness under FAR Part 31 as guides for agencies to evaluate REAs that seek cost relief caused by COVID-19.
Later Friday, the Pentagon announced that Department of Defense agencies immediately will move to increase progress payments to contractors performing contracts with FAR progress payment clauses.
The Department of the Air Force issued its own memorandum discussing mission essential activities exempt from shutdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Air Force noted that the Department of Homeland Security’s guidance on critical infrastructure sectors “considers our Defense Industrial Base part of the nation’s critical infrastructure.” The Air Force concluded that “activities performed on Air Force and Space Force contracts may be considered mission essential and necessary for continuation as part of our nation’s critical infrastructure.”
Further, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen M. Lord issued guidance addressing the Defense Industrial Base and noting that contractors “aligned with the essential critical infrastructure workforce definition are expected to maintain their normal work schedules.” Ms. Lord’s memorandum recognized that contracts or subcontracts to support, among other things, development or productions of weapons systems, fielding or sustainment of software systems, and training or equipping military forces are considered critical infrastructure endeavors that, notwithstanding cost and schedule growth, must remain open and supported.
The aforementioned Air Force and DoD memoranda notwithstanding, given the proliferation of “stay-at-home” orders issued by many states, we recommend that contractors carefully document their schedule impacts and cost growth. Also, when seeking schedule or cost relief through REAs, contractors should cite to FAR 31.201-3, which recognizes that compliance with state law and regulation serves as a factor in determining cost reasonableness. Read together, these memoranda indicate that federal procurement agencies intend to work equitably with government contractors rather than strictly invoke clauses that might typically allow for schedule relief only. Pillsbury’s Government Contracts team will keep you informed about guidance that arises from other Department of Defense and civilian agencies. Please stay safe and let us know if we can help.
