Latest Publications

Share:

How Safe Is Your 363(m) Sale? The Supreme Court’s Invalidation of Statutory Mootness is a Risk to Asset Purchasers Seeking...

On April 19, 2023, Justice Ketangi Brown Jackson, writing for a unanimous Court in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC et.al., 598 U.S. ___ 143 S. Ct. 927 (2023), held that Bankruptcy Code section 363(m) is not...more

Who Can Be A Future Claims Representative In The Third Circuit?

Imerys Talc American, Inc. (“Imerys”) filed bankruptcy in response to crushing liability imposed by mounting asbestos and talc personal injury claims to take advantage of Bankruptcy Code § 524(g) which, among other things,...more

City of Chicago v. Fulton Applied to Prepetition Garnishment

The City of Chicago impounded vehicles for nonpayment of fines. When the owners filed chapter 13 cases and requested that the city return their vehicles, the city refused. The bankruptcy court held that the city’s refusal...more

Bifurcated Fee Agreements Approved in Southern District of Florida, But Barred in Western District of Kentucky

The United States Supreme Court ruled that 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(1) does not authorize compensation to debtors’ attorneys from estate funds. Lamie v. U.S. Trustee, 540 U.S. 1023 (2004). A chapter 7 lawyer cannot look to the...more

COMPLIANCE WITH OFFICIAL BANKRUPTCY FORM 105 SATISFIES ASHCROFT V. IQBAL

Section 11 of Official Bankruptcy Form 105, Involuntary Petition Against an Individual, provides: Allegation- Each petitioner is eligible to file this petition under 11 U.S.C. § 303(b). The debtor may be the...more

You Have to Follow the Rules: The Importance of Adhering to Bankruptcy Rule 2002 When Serving Claims Bar Date Notices

A Delaware bankruptcy court recently held that the bar date for filing proofs of claim cannot be enforced against a creditor if the notice of the bar date was not sent by mail to that creditor. In re Cyber Litigation Inc.,...more

Bankruptcy Rules of Procedure Apply When a District Court is Hearing a “Related To” Proceeding

The First Circuit was required to decide whether the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Civil Rules”) govern a case that comes within the federal...more

Disqualification Of Attorney For Creditor Committee Vacated

The relationship for which counsel for a committee could be disqualified was addressed in the recent case of Bingham Greenbaum Doll, LLP v. Glenview Health Care Facility, Inc., 620 B.R. 582 (6th Cir. B.A.P. 2020)...more

The Third Circuit, Latent Tort Claims And Bankruptcy Code § 524(g)

To give a reorganized debtor a “fresh start,” the Bankruptcy Code provides that the confirmation of a plan discharges the debtor from any debt that arose before the confirmation date. However, if a potential claimant lacks...more

Payment To Stalking Horse Permissible When Sale Price Less Than Stalking Horse Bid

In an issue of first impression, in In re Energy Future Holdings Corp., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7400 (3d Cir. Mar. 15, 2021), the Third Circuit addressed the question whether an initial bidder whose break-up fee was disallowed...more

Bankruptcy Court Grants Motion To Dismiss Based Upon Affirmative Defense

When deciding a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to Federal R. Bankr. 7008, which incorporates Rule 12(b)(6), a court must accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe all inferences from those...more

Eleventh Circuit Holds “New Value” Need Not Remain Unpaid

One of the commonly asserted defenses to preference avoidance actions is the “new value” defense set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(4). One issue considered by courts is whether the “new value” must remain unpaid. In a recent...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide