A Legal Analysis of “Tiger King, Episode 1: Not Your Average Joe” (Part 1)

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC
Contact

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC

What would it take to be Joe Exotic’s attorney? To steal a page from the first episode of the Netflix docuseries, “Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness,” not your average attorney. Just imagine all the questions they’d confront: Will the former owner of G.W. Zoo sign the retainer agreement as “Joe Exotic” or “Tiger King?” And how hefty would that retainer have to be, to compensate for so many crazy issues? Will it cover the cost of all the Pepto-Bismol and Prilosec the attorney will need? Or is that extra? 

As general counsel to a variety of businesses, I have faced many unique problems. But none compare to the legal issues raised in the very first “Tiger King” episode, “Not Your Average Joe.” There were so many issues, in fact, I have decided to break my legal analysis of the episode into multiple parts. So, sit back, relax and enjoy a lawyer’s take on our introduction to the gun-toting operator of an Oklahoma big cat farm.

Why Enter a Work Made For Hire Agreement?

The episode opens with Rick Kirkham saying, “It was a crazy beginning.” I’d say so, what with folks riding in cars with lions and adults ice skating with tigers. Even so, the craziest thing that occurred was Joe Exotic allowing Rick Kirkham to film a documentary and produce Joe’s internet show without a properly negotiated contract.

As general counsel to G.W. Zoo and Mr. Exotic (who we see fire multiple rounds into a nearby lake and blow up mannequins), I would have advised a clearly written contract be drawn up between Joe and Mr. Kirkham, to ensure G.W. Zoo and Joe keep ownership of their brand and the internet television show footage. Such a document is known as a “work made for hire” agreement, and it should be in writing. Any business that uses a contractor to produce media (such as an internet television show to bash Carole Baskin) should have a work made for hire agreement in place to clarify who owns the film. 

Stay tuned for Part 2 of our legal analysis of Episode 1 later this week.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide