Cellphone Searches After Riley v. California: Will This Landmark Decision Transform Hallowed Fourth and Fifth Amendment Constitutional Law?

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP
Contact

SUMMARY

- In a seminal decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie that police need a warrant justified by probable cause to search a cellphone seized incident to lawful arrest. However, the legal implications of this case go far beyond criminal procedure. This decision not only challenges the assumptions that underlie the Fourth Amendment “reasonable suspicion” standard for searches on public school campuses, but also the Fifth Amendment issue of forced decryption of cellphone passwords. As technological advances gradually render what was once private as now public, the U.S. Supreme Court will be forced to confront the realities of how technology impacts our daily lives. The Riley decision likely will change the way school administrators maintain safety and order on campuses as well as the way we protect our personal privacy.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide