Court Of Chancery Upholds Stockholder Consents

Morris James LLP
Contact

Kerbawy v. McDonnell , C.A. 10769-VCP (August 18, 2015)

Given the sanctity of the stockholder vote in Delaware law, it would be surprising if the Court of Chancery would ever reverse such a vote or the use of stockholder consents to take corporate action.

This decision upholding such consents sets out the various unique situations that might justify reversing the vote, but then refuses to do so. While one would expect, as this decision acknowledges, that misrepresentations might be one of those cases justifying a reversal, it is noteworthy that outsiders do not have a fiduciary duty to tell all the truth all the time in a contest for stockholder vote. In that sense they are more like our politicians.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide