MoFo New York Tax Insights - Volume 4, Issue 9 - September 2013

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

In This Issue:

Gain on Sale of Non-New York Leaseholds Held Properly Sourced to New York Based on Business Allocation Percentage; Tribunal Reverses Dismissal and Allows Case to Proceed Before ALJ; Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Tax Penalties Under Comity; When Does Interest Start to Run on a Tax Refund?; and Insights in Brief.

Excerpt from Gain on Sale of Non-New York Leaseholds Held Properly Sourced to New York Based on Business Allocation Percentage -

A New York State Administrative Law Judge held that a nonresident shareholder in a corporation that elected New York S corporation status should have included his pro rata share of the gain from the S corporation’s sale of four Pennsylvania leasehold interests in his New York source income, based on the S corporation’s business allocation percentage. Matter of Steven E. Breitman, DTA No. 824268 (N.Y.S. Div. of Tax App., Aug. 1, 2013).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide