Permissive Interlocutory Appeals and Collective-Action Certification

Burr & Forman
Contact

In an article published on Nov. 27, 2015 in Bloomberg BNA’s Class Action Litigation Report, E. Travis Ramey discusses collective action, which is the representative mass litigation procedure available to parties litigating under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Ramey explains the difference between class actions and collective actions, as well as Rule 23(f), which provides for permissive appeals of class-certification decisions. Rule 23(f) also applies to collective actions, and Ramey urges the Supreme Court to amend the rules to allow for permissive interlocutory review of a district court’s decision to grant or deny a request to certify a collective action. He argues that these two approaches to mass litigation, class action and collective action, are treated differently on a procedural basis.

Originally published in Class Action Litigation Report, 16 CLASS 1313 - November 27, 2015.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Burr & Forman | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Burr & Forman
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Burr & Forman on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide