In the modern age of the Internet where “news”—whether or not it’s true—spreads worldwide in an instant, high-profile corporate and individual reputations are under attack every day from business adversaries, disgruntled employees, dissatisfied customers and others. First Amendment protections sometimes leave the targets of these assaults with no meaningful remedy. But, even the First Amendment has its limits. When these attacks consist of provably false statements, the target often has a valid defamation claim, even when no actual harm to reputation can be proved.

Such was the case in Stephen Wynn v. Joseph Francis. On June 23, 2014, the California Court of Appeal upheld a $19 million jury verdict that Brownstein’s Entertainment and Defamation Litigation Group secured on behalf of Steve Wynn in his slander suit against Girls Gone Wild founder Joe Francis. Wynn filed the lawsuit after Francis falsely accused Wynn of threatening his life. Francis first blurted out (literally) the accusation in court during a hearing in an unrelated debt collection proceeding. Outside the courtroom, he repeated the accusation to a reporter who had witnessed the in-court outburst, and he confirmed that it was “absolutely true.”