Should Boeing Fly To Nevada?

Allen Matkins
Contact

Allen Matkins

After Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn's in September issued his opinion in In re Boeing Company Derivative LitigationUCLA Professor Stephen Bainbridge declaimed that "After Boeing, Caremark is no longer 'the most difficult theory in corporation law upon which a plaintiff might hope to win a judgment'".   Last week, it was reported that the Boeing directors had settle the lawsuit by, among other things, agreeing to pay $237.5 million.  

In In re Caremark Int'l, 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996), Chancellor Allen pronounced that directors could be liable for failures of oversight.  To succeed on such a claim, however, a plaintiff must show either that the directors:

  • “utterly failed to implement any reporting information restrictions or controls”; or
  • having implemented them, “consciously failed to monitor or oversee their operations, thus disabling themselves from being informed of risks or problems requiring their attention.” 

In the ensuing quarter-century, plaintiffs have made repeated, and mostly unsuccessful, attempts to plead Caremark claims.  Even when these claims are dismissed, stockholders have had to bear the costs of defense.   If Professor Bainbridge is correct, Caremark is no longer a tough claim to bring, Caremark claims will increase, and more stockholder money will be spent in defending and settling Caremark claims.

Boeing and its stockholders may want to take note of the fact that the Nevada Supreme Court has never mentioned, much less followed, Caremark.   Further, NRS 78.138 provides that, with certain exceptions, no director or officer is individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders for damages unless the business judgment presumption has been rebutted and it is proven that:

  • The director’s or officer’s act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer; and
  • Such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.

Given Delaware's apparent relaxation of Caremark, corporations may want to look west to Nevada.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide