State Lawmakers Oppose Proposed 10 Year Freeze on AI Laws + Regulations

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider
Contact

On June 3, 2025, a bipartisan group of 260 state lawmakers sent a letter to the U.S. House of Representatives and the U. S. Senate expressing “strong opposition to the provision in Subtitle C, Part 2 of the tax and budget reconciliation bill, which would undermine ongoing work in the states to address the impact of artificial intelligence (AI).”

The letter was in response to a provision in the proposed tax and budget reconciliation bill that seeks to legislate a ten-year freeze on any state or local regulation of AI, in effect preempting states from enacting any laws that would regulate AI.

According to the letter, the preemption would “would cut short democratic discussion of AI policy in the states with a sweeping moratorium that threatens to halt a broad array of laws and restrict policymakers from responding to emerging issues.” Moreover,

[t]he sweeping federal preemption provision in Congress’s reconciliation bill would also overreach to halt a broad array of laws elected officials have already passed to address pressing digital issues. Over the past several years, states across the country have enacted AI-related laws increasing consumer transparency, setting rules for the government acquisition of new technology, protecting patients in our healthcare system, and defending artists and creators. State legislators have done thoughtful work to protect constituents against some of the most obvious and egregious harms of AI that the public is facing in real time. A federal moratorium on AI policy threatens to wipe out these laws and a range of legislation, impacting more than just AI development and leaving constituents across the country vulnerable to harm.

States have always been on the forefront of protecting consumers’ rights and interests. A proposed ten-year ban on states’ ability to determine what its citizens deem appropriate for their protection when it comes to AI is paternalistic and contradictory to the notion of decreasing the federal government to allow states to legislate for its citizens. It is inconceivable how rapidly AI will develop in the next ten years. Hamstringing state legislatures from addressing AI in any way for a decade is not prudent. If you agree, call your members of Congress and urge them to “reject any provisions that preempt state and local AI legislation in this year’s reconciliation package.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

Written by:

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide