The Misleading Case For A Majority Vote Standard

Allen Matkins
Contact

Proponents of a majority vote requirement for the election of directors often decry the fact that under a plurality vote standard, a director can win with a single vote.  For example, the 2015 proxy statement of Nabors Industries Ltd. included the following argument by the Massachusetts Laborers’ Pension Fund in support of its majority vote proposal:

Under the plurality vote standard, a nominee for the board can be elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, even if a substantial majority of the votes cast are “withheld” from the nominee.

However, does this argument really hold water?

To be elected under a majority vote standard, the number of votes cast “for” the nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee.  Thus, it is entirely possible under a majority vote standard for a nominee to be elected by a single vote (e.g., 5,000,001 votes are cast for her election and 5,000,000 are cast against her election).  Thus, the idea that a majority vote standard prevents election by a single vote is specious.

While it is theoretically possible under a plurality vote system for a nominee to be elected with only one affirmative vote, that outcome would be highly unlikely for a publicly traded company.  With a majority vote rule, it is also possible, although also highly unlikely, for a director to win with only a single affirmative vote.  For example, an election my result in the following tally: 1 vote for, 0 votes against, 10,000,000 abstentions and broker non-votes. Thus, the fact that a nominee may be elected by a single affirmative vote even if a substantial majority of votes are withheld the nominee does not distinguish majority voting from plurality voting.

The effect of so-called “withheld votes” also does not distinguish a majority vote rule from a plurality vote rule.  Under a majority vote rule, abstentions and broker non-votes are typically not counted as votes “cast” and hence they do not affect the outcome.  A plurality vote rule only looks at the number of votes for a director.  Hence abstentions and broker non-votes also have no effect on the outcome.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide