The Prevailing Uncertainty of a Second Bite at the Apple at the PTAB Under § 325(d) in Multiple Proceeding Cases

WilmerHale
Contact

After filing a first post-grant proceeding, whether an inter partes review, a covered business method proceeding or a post-grant review petition challenging certain claims of a patent, the same petitioner may decide to file a follow-on petition challenging the same claims of the same patent. The reasons for filing another petition may vary, for example: (1) the first petition was denied and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board panel identified certain deficiencies that the petitioner would like to correct in a second petition; (2) the petitioner would like to raise new grounds or new prior art that the petitioner did not raise in the first instance; or (3) the law changed since the petitioner filed its first petition. Under any of these circumstances, can a petitioner expect a PTAB panel to consider its second petition on the merits?

Originally published in Bloomberg BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal - December 18, 2015.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© WilmerHale | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

WilmerHale
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

WilmerHale on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide