Tokyo Dispute Resolution & Crisis Management Newsletter – February 2020

King & Spalding
Contact

In late 2017, South Africa modernized its International Arbitration Act (the “IAA”) and showed potential to become the arbitral seat of choice for arbitrations involving African parties. Just a few months later, however, South Africa took a step in the opposite direction when its Protection of Investment Act 22 of 2015 came into effect and replaced all of South Africa’s bilateral investment treaties (“BITs”) with watered-down protections for foreign investors and no right to investor-State arbitration.

These mixed signals have serious implications for foreign investors looking to invest in South Africa, who should assess their investment risks against this background. On balance, foreign investors entering into commercial contracts with South African parties may consider South Africa the agreed seat for arbitration, while new investors investing in South Africa should channel their investments through countries that have BITs with South Africa that have not yet been terminated.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide