Users of free mobile apps not protected by Video Privacy Protection Act

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider
Contact

Significantly, the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion on October 9th that consumers who download and use free mobile apps do not fall within the definition of a “subscriber” under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). The VPPA was enacted in 1988 following the disclosure of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork’s video rental records (remember the questions around Anita Hill?) The significance of this ruling is that there has been a plethora of class action litigation against companies who disclose information about users of mobile apps without their consent.

In this case, The Cartoon Network allegedly disclosed information about its free mobile app users without their consent in violation of the VPPA. The Court disagreed and found that the mere downloading and viewing freely available material through a free mobile app does not rise to the level of becoming a subscriber, who is afforded the protection of the VPPA.

Good news for companies that offer free mobile apps. Bad news for plaintiffs’ class action attorneys.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide