News & Analysis as of

D&O Insurance Breach of Contract Insurance Litigation

Wiley Rein LLP

Delaware Federal Court Holds Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claim Against Federal Grant Awardee for Disallowed Costs

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware, applying Delaware law, has held that no coverage exists under a directors and officers liability policy for a claim arising from disallowed federal grant...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - April 2024

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Dominance was the theme of this year’s NCAA basketball tournament, with the UConn men’s team winning back-to-back championships and the South Carolina women’s team reclaiming the title with a perfect record. But let’s not...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Second Circuit Affirms Ruling That Excess D&O Insurer Is Not Required to Advance Defense Costs

Wiley Rein LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, applying New York law, held that a former director is not entitled to injunctive relief requiring an excess D&O insurer to pay his defense costs because the director has not...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Arbitration Award for Amounts Owed Under Separation Agreement Not Covered Loss

Wiley Rein LLP on

In a win for Wiley’s client, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, held that no coverage was available for an arbitration award awarding amounts owed under a CEO’s separation...more

Morris James LLP

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Delaware Choice-of-Law Ruling In Dismissal of D&O Liability Insurance Coverage Dispute

Morris James LLP on

Stillwater Mining Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al., No. 24, 2022 (Del. Jan. 12, 2023) - This decision from Delaware Supreme Court addresses choice-of-law questions for D&O insurance...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers

Part Seven: Reviewing Key U.S. Insurance Decisions, Trends, & Developments

This is the seventh and final installment of our series of articles reviewing some of the key trends and developments currently impacting the U.S. insurance industry. Some key decisions impacting the D&O and securities law...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer Owes Duty to Defend and Indemnify Nuisance Litigation

Wiley Rein LLP on

A federal district court, applying California law, has held that an insurer owed a duty to defend and indemnify an insured in an underlying nuisance litigation under a not-for-profit D&O policy, as the policy’s pollution,...more

Wiley Rein LLP

D&O Policy’s Professional Services Exclusion and Contract Exclusion Do Not Bar Coverage For Claims Arising from Trade Show...

Wiley Rein LLP on

Applying Illinois law, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has held that a D&O policy’s professional services and contract exclusions do not bar coverage for lawsuits seeking damages for fees and...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Where Policy Contains no Duty to Defend, Reasonableness of Insurer’s Decision to Withhold Consent to Settlement Judged from...

Wiley Rein LLP on

In answering a certified question from the Ninth Circuit, the Arizona Supreme Court has held that, where the policy contains no duty to defend, the objective reasonableness of an insurer’s decision to withhold consent to...more

Carlton Fields

Cow Manure Meets Insurance Law: Seventh Circuit Addresses Breach of Contract Exclusions in Malpractice Insurance

Carlton Fields on

Errors and omissions (E&O) and directors and officers (D&O) professional liability insurance policies commonly contain breach of contract endorsements that exclude coverage for claims “based upon or arising out of” a breach...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Insurance Recovery Law - November 2015

Despite Prior Suits, Policyholder Entitled to Coverage for DOJ Investigation - Why it matters: A policyholder was entitled to coverage for a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation despite already facing possibly...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Insurance Recovery Law - July 2015 #2

California Court: Rejected Demand Within Policy Limits Not Necessary for Bad Faith Claim - Why it matters: Insurers must proceed with caution when they become aware that a settlement within policy limits is possible,...more

Morris James LLP

RSUI Indem. Co. v. Sempris LLC, C.A. No. N13C-10-096 MMJ CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Sept. 3, 2014)

Morris James LLP on

In this case, brought in the Delaware Superior Court’s Complex Commercial Litigation Division, the Court considered whether RSUI Indemnity Co. (“RSUI”) owed insurance coverage obligations to Sempris, LLC (“Sempris”). RSUI...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide