News & Analysis as of

Evidence Expert Testimony

HaystackID

From Evidence to Misinformation: Courts Brace for Deepfake Challenges

HaystackID on

As deepfake technology becomes increasingly sophisticated and accessible, courts are now facing unprecedented challenges in distinguishing authentic evidence from AI-generated fabrications. This issue, particularly critical...more

U.S. Legal Support

Best Practices for Preparing an Expert Witness for Deposition

U.S. Legal Support on

As a trial attorney, you’ll often enlist expert witnesses to evaluate claims, clarify complex evidence, write an expert witness report, and offer authoritative opinions. Because time and money can be tight during trial prep,...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

No, Courts Cannot Just Adopt A Court Appointed Expert’s Opinion Without a Cross Examination

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The Rules of Court clearly allow a Family Part Judge to appoint their own expert on any issues, whether custody or economic issues, in order to aid the court in making a decision on an issue before the Court. The Court rule...more

Cooley LLP

A Sword and A Shield: How SCOTUS Expert Testimony Rulings May Benefit Corporate Defendants

Cooley LLP on

The US Supreme Court decided several criminal procedure cases during the 2023 – 2024 term – including Diaz v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1727 (2024) and Smith v. Arizona, 144 S. Ct. 1785 (2024) – which have relevance and...more

Kilpatrick

Eighth Circuit concludes that admissibility at class certification is a “red-herring”

Kilpatrick on

In Cody v. City of St. Louis, 103 F.4th 523 (8th Cir. 2024), the Eight Circuit maintained its position that admissibility standards do not apply strictly at the class certification stage, thereby solidifying a circuit split...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

California Supreme Court Walks Middle Ground on Warnings Causation but Reaffirms Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Himes

As we reported in April, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified a question on California’s Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Himes v. Somatics, LLC, 2022 WL 989469 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022). The...more

Benesch

With the Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Amendment in Place, Federal Courts Issue Rulings in Conformity with the Changes, and...

Benesch on

It has now been over six months since the amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 regarding the admissibility of expert testimony went into effect on Dec. 1, 2023....more

Cooley LLP

The Dangers of Interfering with Expert Evidence

Cooley LLP on

The recent decision in Glover and Another v. Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Ltd and Others should serve as a warning to practitioners to pay heed to the strict rules regarding expert evidence and, in...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

"If You Most Know, You Know”: Expert Testimony That “Most” Drug Couriers Know They’re Carrying Drugs Allowed to...

If you know, you know. The government’s less familiar version — if most know, the defendant knows — just got a boost from the Supreme Court of the United States, which recently held that Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) did...more

Miller Canfield

Junk Science or Relevant Evidence: Supreme Court Says Experts May Now Aid in Determining Criminal Intent

Miller Canfield on

In criminal cases, oftentimes the most significant element in dispute is whether the defendant harbored the intent to “knowingly” or “willfully” violate the criminal law at issue.  If the defendant denies that he knew what he...more

Benesch

U.S. Supreme Court Allows Prosecutors a Game-Changing Weapon: Broad Expert Testimony on Criminal Intent

Benesch on

Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides that experts in criminal cases cannot state an opinion about the defendant’s mens rea. That is, the expert must not state an opinion about “whether the defendant did or did not have a...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Northern District of Illinois Holds that Seventh Circuit Precedent is Incompatible with Rule 702 as Amended

In explaining the December 2023 amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the Advisory Committee called out several ways in which “many courts” had “incorrectly” applied Rule 702 and failed to adequately discharge their...more

IMS Legal Strategies

Two Lives: Clinical Surgeon And Medical Expert Witness

IMS Legal Strategies on

As a forensic orthopedic and spine surgeon, Dr. James Barlow has seen it all, but one case sticks out in memory. originally published by NCADA....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Is Evidence of All Claimed Elements in Prior Art Enough? Not Without Motivation to Combine

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a Patent Trial & Appeal Board obviousness decision, finding that disclosure in the prior art of all recited claim elements across multiple references, without more,...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Blockchain Analysis and Related Expert Testimony Admissible In Criminal Trial

Ballard Spahr LLP on

It is challenging for law enforcement to track down and trace illicit activities conducted through digital currencies. The process can be very time- and resource-intensive. Further, securing charges and arrests, and...more

Stark & Stark

What is Undue Influence in the Context of a Will Contest?

Stark & Stark on

During a Will contest, a party challenging a Will may assert that the Will was the product undue influence being exerted over the decedent by the party who benefited by the disputed Will. The question arises: What is what is...more

Marshall Dennehey

Neurosurgeon’s Expert Opinions in Trial Against a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Were Admissible as Plaintiff Opened the...

Marshall Dennehey on

Waechter v. Laser Spine Institute, LLC, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 112022, 2023-Ohio-3715 - The plaintiff brought an action against a certified registered nurse  anesthetist (CRNA), alleging she was negligent in hyperextending...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Old Habits Die Hard: First Circuit Cites Newly Amended Language of FRE 702 But Follows Abrogated Precedent Instead

The longer and more frequently a principle is repeated by the courts, the more difficult it can be for courts to acknowledge change. As illustrated by the First Circuit’s opinion in Rodriguez v. Hospital San Cristobal, Inc.,...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Important Changes to Rule 702 and Expert Testimony

McGuireWoods LLP on

The federal rule of evidence governing expert testimony — Rule 702 — just saw its most significant change in almost 25 years. The new Rule 702, which went into effect Dec. 1, 2023, gives litigants important new tools for...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

A New and Challenging Obstacle for California Employers’ Use of Experts in State Courts

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Employers litigating cases in California courts face many obstacles. Summary judgment has become increasingly difficult for employers. Criminal cases take precedent and often cause trial postponements, resulting in civil...more

Carlton Fields

Federal Rule Amendment Clarifies Requirements for Admitting Expert Testimony

Carlton Fields on

On December 1, 2023, Federal Rule of Evidence 702 was amended to “clarify and emphasize” that, before expert witness testimony can be admitted, the proponent must satisfy all the rule’s requirements by a preponderance of the...more

IMS Legal Strategies

5 Key Considerations Regarding the Use of 3D Animation for Litigation

IMS Legal Strategies on

In recent years, 3D animation has emerged as a powerful tool for teaching and transforming complex information into a digestible and compelling visual. Animation brings a case to life and can have a greater impact on juries,...more

IMS Legal Strategies

The Crucial Role of Expert Evidence in Complex International Arbitration

IMS Legal Strategies on

In an era when companies from Boston are as likely to do business with Beijing as Baltimore, and a Seoul firm has regular commerce with Sao Paulo and Santiago, the means by which corporations and countries hammer out their...more

Kilpatrick

Rule 702 has been amended to clarify the burden of proof and the trial court’s gatekeeping role

Kilpatrick on

Effective December 1, 2023, Federal Rule of Evidence 702 has been amended to address the standard for admission of expert opinion testimony. The amendments confirm that the trial judge, in its gatekeeping role, must determine...more

Frantz Ward LLP

Just What I Wanted for the Holidays: Changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence

Frantz Ward LLP on

There is an adage that lawyers learn the version of the rules of evidence and procedure that are current when they are in law school and then do not look at them again. While that is (hopefully) an exaggeration, it is always...more

224 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 9

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide