News & Analysis as of

Negligence Strict Product Liability

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Level Unlocked: Insurance Recovery Options for Video Game Manufacturers Facing Video Game Addiction Lawsuits

In the last few years, the video game industry has been hit with lawsuits accusing certain games of fostering addictive behaviors, especially among younger players. These lawsuits often cite features like loot boxes,...more

White and Williams LLP

Georgia’s Products Liability Statute of Repose: “First Sale” vs. “A Sale”

White and Williams LLP on

In L’Oreal USA, Inc. v. Burroughs, 372 Ga. App. 30, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 250, the Court of Appeals of Georgia (Appellate Court) considered whether Georgia’s ten-year statute of repose for products liability precluded strict...more

White and Williams LLP

Negligent Undertaking Claim Against Amazon May Succeed Where a Products Liability Claim Fails

In Johnson v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 4:22-CV-04086, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59196, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas held that Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) can be liable for negligent undertaking...more

Goldberg Segalla

Asbestos Damages in the Maritime Sphere

Goldberg Segalla on

The shipping industry is an extensive and foundational mode of global transportation and resource distribution. The men and women who work aboard the U.S. fleet are routinely exposed to varying types of cargo, machinery, and...more

Dechert LLP

Dechert Re:Torts - Issue 14

Dechert LLP on

A Prescription for Liability: Michigan Repeals Flagship Drug Immunity Law - Michigan’s recent repeal of immunity provisions under its Product Liability Act has potentially significant implications for pharmaceutical...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Communications Decency Act Does Not Bar Claims Against Social Media Companies Due To Mass Shooting

A New York State trial court has held, in Patterson et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al., that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) does not preclude, as a matter of law, claims asserted against various social media...more

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley

How Can You Have Safety in the Face of Deceptive Marketing? The Critical Battle for Booster Seat Safety and Deceptive Marketing –...

As a lawyer handling product liability cases, I’ve come across numerous instances that highlight the often dangerous shortcomings of child safety products. But nothing quite underscores the gravity of this issue like the...more

White and Williams LLP

I Spy Claims Against Amazon

White and Williams LLP on

A federal court in West Virginia recently ruled that a negligence claim could proceed against Amazon related to a spy camera used to take unsolicited photos of a teenage girl. M.S. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-0046, 2023...more

Dechert LLP

Dechert Re:Torts - Key Developments in Product Liability and Mass Torts - Issue 11

Dechert LLP on

Recent Nuclear Verdicts Highlight Danger of Punitive Damages - In October and November 2023, four separate products liability trials ended with large plaintiff verdicts. Three of these verdicts were against Monsanto in...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Tank Rupture/Hazardous Materials Transportation Act: Federal Court Addresses Whether State Law Claims for Negligence/Strict...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (“Second Circuit”) addressed in an August 24th Opinion whether the federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (“HMTA”) preempted certain state tort law claims in...more

White and Williams LLP

Indiana Appellate Court Allows Third-Party Spoliation Claim to Proceed

White and Williams LLP on

In Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana as Subrogee of Ramona Smith v. Blue Sky Innovation Group, Inc., et al, No. 22A-CT-1924, 2023 Ind. App. LEXIS 157, the Court of Appeals of Indiana (Appellate Court) reversed a trial court...more

White and Williams LLP

Montana Significantly Revises Its Product Liability Laws

White and Williams LLP on

On May 4, 2023, Montana changed its product liability laws when the Governor signed SB 216, which was effective upon passage and applies to claims that accrue on or after May 4, 2023. Among the changes is the adoption of a...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Illinois Takes Expansive View of Personal Jurisdiction Over Component Parts Manufacturer

McGuireWoods LLP on

Building on federal precedent regarding specific jurisdiction over vehicle manufacturers, the Appellate Court of Illinois recently extended personal jurisdiction to a component parts manufacturer in a decision with...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: Is There a Defense Where a Plaintiff Altered a Product?

Is there a defense where a plaintiff altered a product? Yes. In an Arkansas products liability claim, the plaintiff must prove that the product was supplied by the defendant in a defective condition. AMI 1008. “If a product...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Guijarro v. Enterprise: The Fifth Circuit Analyzes Multiple Issues Pertinent to Product-Liability Cases

The Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Guijarro v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc., No. 21-40512, 2022 WL 2433778 (5th Cir. July 5, 2022), provides solid foundational arguments on issues pertinent in most product-liability cases....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: Does a Supplier of a Defective Product Have Recourse Against a Manufacturer?

Does a supplier of a defective product have recourse against a manufacturer? Yes. By statute, Arkansas has created indemnification rights accruing in favor of product suppliers. When a supplier of a defective product is not...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: Does Arkansas Law Recognize a Cause of Action for Failure to Warn?

Does Arkansas law recognize a cause of action for failure to warn? Yes. Failure to warn claims may be applicable against both manufacturers and suppliers. A manufacturer of a product has a duty to give a reasonable and...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: What Is the Definition of "Defective Condition" Under Arkansas Law?

What is the definition of “defective condition” under Arkansas law? “Defective condition” is defined by statute to mean “a condition of a product that renders it unsafe for reasonably foreseeable use and consumption.” Ark....more

Rumberger | Kirk

Florida Product Liability Law: 4th DCA Affirms Summary Judgment with Key Holdings for Manufacturers

Rumberger | Kirk on

On June 15, 2022, the Fourth DCA issued its opinion in Michael Grieco v. Daiho Sangyo., Inc., AW Distributing, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP affirming entry of summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer, distributor...more

Bennett Jones LLP

The Expansion and Contraction of Product Liability Causes of Action

Bennett Jones LLP on

Product liability case law in 2021 brought clarity to certain causes of action that often form the basis of product liability claims. In particular, Ontario courts considered new duty of care categories arising within the...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Is the Violation of a Statute Negligence Per Se?

The answer to this question varies widely from state to state. But in Arkansas “the violation of a statute is only evidence of negligence and does not constitute negligence per se.” Cent. Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field...more

White and Williams LLP

Are Industry Standards Beside the Point Where Strict Liability is Claimed?

White and Williams LLP on

It has been almost seven years since Tincher v. Omega Flex Inc. was decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The Tincher court left much unanswered but called on Pennsylvania’s lower courts, the legal academy and the bar to...more

White and Williams LLP

Industry Standard and Sole Negligence Defenses Can’t Fix a Defect

White and Williams LLP on

Strict products liability cases have been the subject of much fluctuation in the Pennsylvania courts over the last few years. Utilizing hope created by the courts in recent strict liability cases, defendants have tried to...more

Morgan Lewis - Up & Atom

Supreme Court Rings Eight Bells and Ends Navy Sailor Fukushima Suit

The US Supreme Court rang eight bells on March 29, rejecting the petition by US Navy sailors to review last year’s Ninth Circuit decision upholding dismissal of their lawsuit in Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Breast Implant Multidistrict Litigation Claims Pared Down by New Jersey Federal Court

Harris Beach PLLC on

In a mass tort product liability, class action and consumer fraud consolidated litigation involving Allergan's Biocell textured breast implants and tissue expanders, Allergan moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaints on...more

33 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide