News & Analysis as of

Potentially Responsible Party (PRP)

Tyson & Mendes LLP

A Seat at the Table: Supreme Court Rules Insurers Have a Right to Be “Heard on Any Issue” in Chapter 11 Cases

Tyson & Mendes LLP on

On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., et al. The Court held an insurer with financial responsibility for claims in bankruptcy...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

EPA May Now Pursue PFOS and PFOA Manufacturers and Users under CERCLA

Effective as of yesterday, July 8, 2024, two widely used per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) are deemed hazardous substances under the Comprehensive...more

BCLP

EPA Designates PFOS and PFOA as CERCLA Hazardous Substances

BCLP on

On April 19, 2024, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced that it is designating perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”) as Hazardous Substances under the...more

McGlinchey Stafford

EPA’s Hazardous Substance Designation of Certain PFAS Compounds Impacts Real Estate Due Diligence

McGlinchey Stafford on

On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Pre-Publication Notice that it was submitting a final rule (Rule) for publication in the Federal Register, designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)...more

Buchalter

Is a Release of CERCLA Claims Ever Really “Full and Final?”

Buchalter on

When Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) settle CERCLA cases, they want finality. They don’t expect to be asked to pay a second time for a claim they have already resolved by settlement. However, a concurring opinion in a...more

WilmerHale

Potential Impacts Of The EPA's Designation Of PFAS As Hazardous Substances

WilmerHale on

Designation of PFAS as Hazardous Substances - On September 6, 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated two per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (collectively, PFAS) as “hazardous substances” under the...more

King & Spalding

Environmental Justice

King & Spalding on

The proposed EPA rule designating PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under CERCLA has significant implications for Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) at both current and closed Superfund sites, as well as for companies...more

Williams Mullen

Limitations Bar Superfund Contribution Action

Williams Mullen on

As a general rule, the law will not allow plaintiffs to sit on legal rights indefinitely. Superfund actions are no exception. The 6th Circuit recently applied this principle, finding a declaratory judgment of liability...more

K&L Gates LLP

EPA Further Expands NPL List - Is Your Company a Potentially Responsible Party?

K&L Gates LLP on

On 17 March 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the addition of twelve sites to the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The EPA has determined that releases of contamination at these sites...more

Woods Rogers

Virginia DEQ Suspends Issuance of Landowner Liability “Comfort Letters”

Woods Rogers on

On December 1, 2021, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (“VDEQ”)  announced via a notice on its Brownfields website that it stopped accepting applications for Bona Fide Prospective Purchase (“BFPP”) and other...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

EPA Announces Plans To Strengthen Environmental Justice Efforts Regarding Waste And Superfund

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

For the second time in as many weeks, the acting head of the EPA’s enforcement office has issued a memorandum (the “Memorandum”) outlining additional actions to advance the EPA’s environmental justice (“EJ”) goals...more

Burr & Forman

Toxins-Are-Us: Bankruptcy Treatment of Environmental Liabilities

Burr & Forman on

Since taking office, President Joseph R. Biden has confirmed his commitment to addressing environmental issues. On April 9, 2021, he proposed allocating $14 billion toward initiatives to fight climate change, including large...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

PFAS And The Transition To The Biden Administration: The Implications Of Designating PFOA And PFOS As “Hazardous Substances” Under...

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

In recent years, there has been no shortage of interest and commentary dedicated to a group of chemicals known collectively as PFAS. As one example, the potential designation of certain PFAS — PFOA and PFOS (perfluorooctanoic...more

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Is Your Insurance Program Ready for the Biden Administration?

The Biden administration has hit the ground running with executive orders, regulatory and legislative priorities, and cabinet-level and other top posts being announced on a daily basis. Our public policy colleagues have been...more

Williams Mullen

EPA Says No Risk from CERCLA Financial Assurance Exemptions for Three Named Industries

Williams Mullen on

EPA has promulgated a final rule declining to impose final assurance requirements on the electric power, petroleum and coal manufacturing, and chemical manufacturing industries to clean up spills of hazardous substances. ...more

Holland & Knight LLP

When Considering Bankruptcy, Don't Forget About Environmental Obligations

Holland & Knight LLP on

With economic downturn comes bankruptcy. It is often observed that the intersections between the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and environmental law can create conflict, because while many federal and state environmental statutes seek...more

K&L Gates LLP

EPA Expands NPL List - Is Your Company a Potentially Responsible Party?

K&L Gates LLP on

On 1 September 2020, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the addition of six sites to the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). EPA has determined that releases of contamination at these...more

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP

Atlantic Richfield v. Christian: Despite Initial Concerns, SCOTUS Decision Does Not Open Floodgates for State Court Challenges to...

Prior to April 2020, it seemed clear under prevailing federal case law that a disgruntled person could not use a state court lawsuit to change an environmental remedy approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Second Circuit Clarifies Trigger Date For CERCLA Cost Recovery Statute Of Limitations

On July 23, in MPM Silicones, LLC v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 17-3468(L), 17-3669(XAP), slip op., -- F.3d -- (2d Cir. 2020), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the District Court’s dismissal of...more

(ACOEL) | American College of Environmental...

EPA Is The CERCLA Gatekeeper: Plaintiffs Need EPA Approval To Seek State Court Damages For Restoration

Landowners seeking restoration damages in state courts, at sites where there is a cleanup remedy previously selected by EPA, may pursue such claims only if they first obtain EPA approval for the proposed restoration work....more

Troutman Pepper

State Law Claims and CERCLA Remedial Actions: Making the Best of a Bad Decision

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently announced a landmark decision under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Act), also known as the Superfund program. In the case of Atlantic...more

Tonkon Torp LLP

The Battle Continues Between Residential Landowners And Industrial Polluters

Tonkon Torp LLP on

In April, the U.S. Supreme Court published their opinion in Atlantic Richfield v. Christian, further tangling the rules of engagement in the fight between residential property owners and industrial polluters...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Environmental Due Diligence in the Wake of Atlantic Richfield

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian (Slip Op. No. 17-1498) confirmed the broad statutory definition of "Potentially Responsible Party" (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court's Decision in Atlantic Richfield: Tip of the Iceberg or Tempest in a Teapot?

Holland & Knight LLP on

In Atlantic Richfield Company v. Christian, a decision issued on April 20, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that state courts may hear state common law claims seeking to compel remediation beyond what the U.S....more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

With EPA Approval, Landowners May Bring State Law Claims for Remedial Action in Addition to Ongoing Superfund Cleanup

Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) does not preclude Montana residents from bringing state common law claims to recover the...more

62 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide