News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Banks

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints

Two Sides to Every Monopolization Suit: DOJ Sues Visa for Debit Monopolization

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints on

On September 24, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) filed a monopolization suit against Visa, Inc. (“Visa”), alleging that Visa has a monopoly in general purpose debit network services and general...more

WilmerHale

The Bank Preemption Ripple Effects After Cantero, Flagstar

WilmerHale on

On May 30, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Cantero v. Bank of America, vacating and remanding a decision by the Second Circuit that concluded that the federally authorized powers of national banks under...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

OCC to review its preemption interpretations in light of Supreme Court opinion and state debanking laws

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On July 17, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu delivered prepared remarks before the Exchequer Club entitled “Size, Complexity, and Polarization in Banking.”...more

GeoDataVision

Chevron is History. Implications for the 2023 Community Reinvestment Act regulations

GeoDataVision on

When the Supreme Court decided in favor of the plaintiff in Loper Bright Enterprises et al vs. Gina Raimondo it overruled its decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the so-called “Chevron Decision” which...more

Cozen O'Connor

SCOTUS Adopts Favorable Standard for States’ Ability to Enforce Consumer Protection Laws Regulating National Banks

Cozen O'Connor on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 22-529, allowing states to enforce state consumer financial protection laws against both state and national banks. The Court was reviewing the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 30, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 22-529: This case addresses the standard for determining when state laws that regulate national banks are...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Was it a pyrrhic victory for the CFPB in the Supreme Court in CFSA v. CFPB?

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On May 16, Justice Thomas issued the majority opinion in which the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, that the CFPB’s funding mechanism comported with the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution which states, in relevant...more

Troutman Pepper

On Heels of Supreme Court Decision, CFPB Announces Updated Compliance Dates for its 1071 Rule

Troutman Pepper on

As discussed here, last week the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited (CFSA) v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) holding that...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Important National Bank Act (NBA) preemption case to be argued Today, February 27, before US Supreme Court

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. will be heard on Tuesday, February 27 before the US Supreme Court. The Court recently granted the unopposed motion of the Solicitor General to participate in the oral...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to hear oral argument on Feb. 27 in National Bank Act preemption case

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On February 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., a case involving the scope of preemption under the National Bank Act (NBA). The question before the Court is whether...more

Troutman Pepper

Amici Argue for Narrow Interpretation of National Bank Act Preemption

Troutman Pepper on

A group of non-profit consumer advocacy organizations, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators filed two separate briefs asking the U.S. Supreme Court to...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Syndicated Loans are Not Securities, Court Rules

Harris Beach PLLC on

In a win for banks and private credit lenders, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit recently ruled a $1.8 billion leveraged loan was not a security. The United States syndicated loan market had been anxiously...more

Troutman Pepper

Credit Union Trade Associations Move to Intervene in Case Challenging CFPB’s Enforcement of its Section 1071 Rule

Troutman Pepper on

On August 10, two credit union trade associations — Credit Union National Association (CUNA) and Cornerstone Credit Union League — and Rally Credit Union (collectively, Proposed Intervenors) filed an Unopposed Emergency...more

Troutman Pepper

Banks From Coast to Coast Urge CFPB to Stay Implementation of its Section 1071 Final Rule

Troutman Pepper on

On August 8, bankers associations from all 50 states sent a joint letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) urging it to stay enforcement and implementation of the small business data collection and...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Comity or Condemnation: Supreme Court to Decide Whether State-Owned Bank is Immune from Criminal Prosecution Under the Foreign...

Foley Hoag LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States is set to determine whether the United States can prosecute a commercial bank, which is majority-owned by the Republic of Turkey, for allegedly violating U.S. law. In 2019, U.S. federal...more

Cozen O'Connor

Cozen Currents: The Politics of Controversy

Cozen O'Connor on

The Cozen Lens- The leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade has brought abortion politics front-and-center. But abortion politics are not as clear cut as "pro-choice" vs. "pro-life" and the court's...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

All Consuming - Financial Litigation Insights: Issue 3, July 2020

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Welcome! Welcome to the new format of All Consuming . We listened to the feedback. A newsletter filled with long articles gives the detailed information some are looking for but becomes another thing that others have to...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

After Madden, OCC and FDIC Propose to Reaffirm “Valid When Made” Rule

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On November 18, 2019, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) took action to reaffirm the “valid when made” doctrine in response to the uncertainty on the validity of interest rates of bank-originated loans sold...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider - June 2018 #4

Robinson & Cole LLP on

Just weeks after Mexico’s central bank was targeted by hackers who stole $15 million, Chile’s biggest bank, Banco de Chile, announced on May 28, 2018, that it had been struck by a “virus” that affected its workstations,...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Your Daily Dose of Financial News

Robins Kaplan LLP on

A couple of big-time SCOTUS opinions released yesterday will leave their mark on the financial world— First, the High Court found that internet retailers can be “required to collect sales taxes in states where they have no...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Food and Beverage Law Update: June 2018

Holland & Knight LLP on

Wage and Hour - Decision Upholds Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Clauses, Resolves Circuit Split - The U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis on May 21, 2018, holding that...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

United States Supreme Court Holds that Foreign Corporations May Not Be Held Liable Under the Alien Tort Statute

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

In Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC, 584 U.S. ___, 2018 WL 1914663 (U.S. Apr. 24, 2018) (Kennedy, J.), the Supreme Court of the United States held that foreign corporations may not be sued under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Supreme Court Forecloses Foreign Corporate Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

• The Supreme Court in Jesner v. Arab Bank ruled 5-4 that suits against foreign corporations under the ATS are barred, answering a question left unresolved in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. • Although the decision...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Red Notice Newsletter - Russian

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

ANTICORRUPTION DEVELOPMENTS – U.S. Agencies Decline to Prosecute Teradata for Alleged FCPA Violations – On February 26, 2018, Teradata Corporation, an Ohio-based enterprise software database management company,...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Red Notice Newsletter - Chinese

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

ANTICORRUPTION DEVELOPMENTS – U.S. Agencies Decline to Prosecute Teradata for Alleged FCPA Violations – On February 26, 2018, Teradata Corporation, an Ohio-based enterprise software database management company,...more

77 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide