News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States Federal Reserve

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Basel Endgame Rules: A Change Is Coming

The Announcement and Its Sources - Last week, the vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Michael S. Barr, gave prepared remarks at the Brookings Institution announcing a significant recalibration of the Fed's Basel...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Two Recent Supreme Court Decisions Could Dramatically Impact Health Care Regulatory Challenges at the Federal and State Levels

For nearly 40 years, federal courts have been required to defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute, even if the court did not agree with that interpretation. This deference, commonly referred to as Chevron...more

Stoel Rives LLP

Restart the Clock: SCOTUS Expands the Timeframe to Challenge Agency Actions

Stoel Rives LLP on

Why are environmental professionals talking about the Federal Reserve Board? Because the Supreme Court, on July 1, 2024, ruled that the APA’s six-year statute of limitations (SOL) for facial challenges to agency regulations...more

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP

Two Supreme Court Decisions Shift the Ground for Legal Challenges to Federal Agency Actions

The Supreme Court has now concluded its most recent term, and in its final two days handed down two decisions with major implications in the area of administrative law (each by a 6-3 margin).  And while their precise...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

The Supreme Court’s Latest Rulings on Administrative Agencies: Implications for ‎Consumer Product Companies

In the final week of this year’s Supreme Court term, the Court issued several decisions that alter the role of federal agencies in the way laws are interpreted and enforced, and thus the way that business will be done in the...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Opens the Door to More Rule Challenges by Extending Accrual Date for APA Cases

In Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the U.S. Supreme Court held the six-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. §2401 for challenging federal agency action under the Administrative...more

J.S. Held

Crosscurrents: Companies Face Regulatory Uncertainties in Wake of SCOTUS Decisions

J.S. Held on

Recent SCOTUS Decisions Expand Litigants’ Ability to Challenge Federal Agency Regulations - Federal agencies are under attack. Recent decisions from the United States Supreme Court are eroding long standing principles of...more

Goodwin

SCOTUS Ruling Makes Federal Agency Rules Susceptible to Previously Untimely Challenges

Goodwin on

​​​​​​​At the close of an extended term, on July 1, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the time period for bringing a facial challenge to a federal agency rule....more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

"Chevron is overruled": How Loper Bright Will Change the Regulatory Law Landscape

In a decision with far-ranging implications for federal administrative law, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Loper Bright).1 The Supreme Court’s...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

When the Right “Accrues”: Corner Post Extends the Statute of Limitations under the Administrative Procedure Act

On July 1, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, holding that an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) claim does not accrue for purposes of the...more

Wiley Rein LLP

SCOTUS Overrules Chevron and Opens Door to More Challenges Under APA: Environmental Law Implications of Loper Bright and Corner...

Wiley Rein LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two opinions at the end of its term impacting environmental law. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Court held that courts must exercise independent judgment when determining if an...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Opens Door to More APA Challenges by Ruling that Right of Action Accrues When Regulation First Causes Injury

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Corner Post, Inc. v Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in which the Court determined when a Section 702 claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

“The Ball is in Congress’ Court”: U.S. Supreme Court in Corner Post Paves the Way for Challenges to Longstanding Treasury...

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

In the final decision of the Supreme Court’s term, the Court again considered the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). Like earlier decisions this term considering the APA (see here and here), the opinion in Corner Post,...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Environment & Energy Insights (July 2024)

Welcome to the July edition of Nutter’s Environment & Energy Insights, a monthly update of current trends in environment and energy law. The Supreme Court has been busy lately, issuing several opinions that will impact...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

U.S. Supreme Court’s Corner Post Ruling Prolongs Federal Agencies’ Exposure to Suit

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

In another notable 6-3 decision following the end of Chevron deference, the Supreme Court of the United States on July 1, 2024, reiterated that suits against federal agencies challenging an agency rule begin to accrue when a...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Consumer Finance Monitor Podcast Episode: Did the Supreme Court Hand the CFPB a Pyrrhic Victory?

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Special guest Professor Hal Scott of Harvard Law School joins us today as we delve into the thought-provoking question of whether the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the landmark case of CFSA v. CFPB really hands the CFPB...more

Saul Ewing LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds CFPB’s Funding Mechanism as Constitutional

Saul Ewing LLP on

On May 16, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, determining once and for all that the...more

Cozen O'Connor

SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of CFPB’s Funding Mechanism

Cozen O'Connor on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in CFPB v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd. upholding the funding structure of the CFPB. The Fifth Circuit had determined that the CFPB’s funding mechanism—drawing funds from the...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The CFPB Survives: Our Take on the Supreme Court Decision

Paul Hastings LLP on

On May 16, 2024, the United States Supreme Court, in a 7-2 opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, upheld the constitutionality of the funding mechanism of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or “Bureau”)....more

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP

Upcoming Supreme Court Decisions Could Change the Landscape for Challenging Federal Agency Regulations

Three cases, all argued this term before the United States Supreme Court and likely to be decided in June, carry major implications for litigation between federal agencies and regulated entities.  Depending on the Court’s...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on the Constitutionality of the Funding of the CFPB

Goodwin on

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 3, 2023 in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. The issue before  the Court is whether the CFPB’s funding...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads

How Much Is Too Much? Oral Arguments in Much Anticipated CFPB Funding Case Leave Justices Wondering

Early in October, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America Ltd (CFPB v. CFSA). The appeal stems from a 2021 Western District of...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to Determine When Clock Starts under APA’s Statute of Limitations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Last Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide when a right of action first accrues for an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) challenge to a final rule issued by a federal agency—when the final rule is issued or when...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Denies Oral Argument to Republican State AGs Who Argue That the CFPB Funding Mechanism Is Unconstitutional

Troutman Pepper on

On August 21, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request by West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey and 26 other state AGs to participate in oral arguments in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) et al. v....more

Troutman Pepper

132 Members of Congress File Amici Brief Urging Supreme Court to Find CFPB Funding Structure Unconstitutional

Troutman Pepper on

As discussed here, on October 19, 2022, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited (CFSA) v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) held that the CFPB’s funding...more

64 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide