News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Urged to Resolve Split on ERISA Standing Requirements in Excessive Fee Cases

Holland & Knight LLP on

Chavez v. Plan Benefit Services, Inc., 108 F.4th 297 (5th Cir. 2024), began when three employees of a single employer sued the service providers of their health and welfare benefit plan for allegedly charging excessive fees...more

King & Spalding

United States District Court in Florida Holds False Claims Act Qui Tam Provision Unconstitutional

King & Spalding on

On September 30, 2024, a federal district court in Florida held the qui tam enforcement provision of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), which permits private citizens to pursue actions in the name of and on behalf of the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - October 4, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in 15 cases: Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Solutions, No. 23-971: This case concerns the intersection between Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, which...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

No Comity Tonight

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

U.S. Bankruptcy Court does not enforce an asset freeze order from a Brazilian insolvency proceeding recognized under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. Recognition of a foreign proceeding under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy...more

Dechert LLP

Dechert Re:Torts - Issue 18

Dechert LLP on

Bipartisan Momentum Builds to Shine Light on Litigation Funders - In October 2023, we discussed the efforts by Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and John Kennedy (R-LA) to address the concerns presented by opaque third-party...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Government Investigations Team Insights - July 2024

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

AGG’s Government Investigations Team Insights provides periodic updates covering legal and regulatory topics. Our team, which includes former federal prosecutors, SEC enforcement attorneys, and federal agency attorneys, has...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Supreme Court: SEC Cannot Force Defendants in Civil-Penalty, Antifraud Enforcement Actions To Litigate Before the Commission...

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided SEC v. Jarkesy. That decision held that individuals subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) enforcement actions in which the SEC seeks civil penalties for...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The Consequential Impact of the Supreme Court’s Monumental Ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy

Paul Hastings LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, holding that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) must prosecute securities fraud before a federal court whenever it...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Unclean Hands: Available for Litigation Misconduct or an Illusory Remedy?

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Discovery misconduct can be remedied not only through the sanctions available in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but also potentially through the defense of unclean hands....more

Ankura

The Sea of Tuna Decisions: Key Takeaways for Regression Analysis at Class Certification

Ankura on

On November 14, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court declined StarKist Company’s petition to review the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion upholding certification of three subclasses of tuna purchasers in Olean...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

Top 10 Whistleblowing and Retaliation Events of 2023

Proskauer Rose LLP on

2023 was another groundbreaking year for whistleblower litigation and bounty awards. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission shattered records by issuing a $279 million award and continued to actively enforce the...more

Wiley Rein LLP

A Banner Year for the False Claims Act at the Supreme Court

Wiley Rein LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2022 term was a blockbuster for the False Claims Act (FCA). The Court recently decided two cases poised to change the landscape of FCA cases in the lower courts: United States ex rel. Schutte...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

True Facts About False Claims: MoFo's FCA Newsletter - July 2023

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

Designed for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, this newsletter seeks to bring you up to speed on key federal and state False Claims Act (FCA) developments, with links to primary resources. Each quarter, we...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

Recent Supreme Court Case Affirms Government’s Power to Dismiss Qui Tam Suits

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief on

On June 16, 2023, the Supreme Court (the “Court”) in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources affirmed the federal government’s power to dismiss a False Claims Act (“FCA”) action brought under the qui tam...more

Littler

Supreme Court Determines When the U.S. Government May Dismiss an FCA Action Over a Relator’s Objection

Littler on

On June 16, 2023, in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split in favor of a broad interpretation of the federal government’s ability to dismiss False...more

K&L Gates LLP

Supreme Court Affirms Government's Broad Dismissal Authority in False Claims Act Suits

K&L Gates LLP on

On 16 June 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources1, holding that the federal government (Government) maintains the authority to...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

False Claims Act Update: A Mid-Year Review (2023)

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Supreme Court issued a number of headline-grabbing decisions this term on topics like religious accommodation, LGBTQ protections, and consideration of race in college admissions. These decisions are wide-reaching and...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Supreme Court Upholds Broad, but Not Unfettered, Government Authority to Dismiss FCA Cases

Latham & Watkins LLP on

DOJ may dismiss qui tam False Claims Act cases at any point, as long as it intervenes in the case and satisfies the deferential Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) standard. The US Supreme Court, in its 8-1 June 16,...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

The Supreme Court Confirms the Government’s Essentially Unfettered Authority to Dismiss False Claims Act Cases

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

On Friday, June 16, 2023, I (sort of) lost my bet that the Supreme Court would follow the path charted in Borzilleri v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, 24 F.4th 32 (1st Cir. 2022) to determine the government’s False Claims...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

The Supreme Court Confirms The Government’s Significant Discretion To Dismiss False Claims Act Cases

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

On June 16, 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., that (i) under the False Claims Act, the government may move to dismiss a False Claims Act (“FCA”) action...more

Snell & Wilmer

Federal Government's Broad Dismissal Authority in FCA Cases Confirmed in Polansky Ruling

Snell & Wilmer on

On Friday, June 16, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., that the federal government has authority to dismiss qui tam (or whistleblower) False Claims Act...more

Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on False Claims Act Dismissals

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in U.S. ex rel. Polansky that the federal government has the authority to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) suit at any stage of litigation, even over a relator's objections, so long as the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 23, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions today: United States v. Texas, No. 22-58: This administrative law and separation of powers case addressed the ability of states to sue the executive branch...more

King & Spalding

U.S. Supreme Court Allows Justice Department to Dismiss Whistleblower Cases

King & Spalding on

On June 16, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that the DOJ properly secured a dismissal of a whistleblower suit accusing Executive Health Resources Inc. of violating the False Claims Act by improperly billing Medicare....more

ArentFox Schiff

US Supreme Court Rules 8-1 in Favor of Government FCA Dismissal Authority

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 16, 2023, in United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., the US Supreme Court addressed the government’s authority to dismiss a qui tam False Claims Act (FCA) suit over a relator’s objection...more

205 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 9
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide