News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,...

Corner Post – Opening Up Administrative Procedures Act, Challenges To The Sentencing Guidelines

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,... on

In our recent post, “As Chevron Goes, So Goes the Sentencing Guidelines”, we discussed the possible ramifications the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright might have on the Sentencing Guidelines going forward. Namely,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - July 2, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On July 1, 2024, the last day of the 2023-2024 term, the Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions: Trump v. United States, No. 23-939: This case concerns the scope of former President Donald J. Trump’s...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 21, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions today: United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915: This Second Amendment case addresses the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which makes it a crime for an...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 23, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 22-807: This case concerns the interplay between allegations of racial and partisan...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Sentencing Guidelines Amendment Prevents Judges From Considering Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on

Since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Watts, 19 US 148 (1997), judges have been permitted to consider acquitted conduct when calculating a defendant’s sentencing guidelines range and determining their...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - March 15, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Lindke v. Freed, No. 22-611: This case addresses whether a public official violates the First Amendment by blocking individuals from commenting on the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Latest on Federal Court Treatment of Criminal Defendants

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

Last week, the Sixth Circuit and Supreme Court issued opinions on criminal law that could affect trial and sentencing strategy for white collar defendants in regulated industries. District court discretion does not...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 16, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions today: United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., No. 21-1052: This case concerned the scope of the government’s authority to dismiss a...more

Dechert LLP

Third Circuit Rejects Use Of “Intended Loss” as Enhancement Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Dechert LLP on

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday in United States v. Banks1 that under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, “loss” means only actual loss and not intended loss. Although the term “loss” is not explicitly...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - September 30, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 20-1566: Whether a federal court hearing state law claims brought under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules to...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - March 2, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the following cases: California v. Texas, No. 19-840; Texas v. California, No. 19-1019: A petition for a writ of certiorari and conditional...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 18, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions today: Gill v. Whitford, No. 16-1161: Twelve Democratic voters in Wisconsin brought a complaint claiming that the state redistricting done under Act 43 was a...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 4, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions today: Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n, No. 16-111: In 2012, a same-sex couple filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - April, 2017

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in two cases today: McLane Co. v. EEOC, No. 15-1248: Damiana Ochoa filed a discrimination charge against petitioner McLane Co. when she was terminated after...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - March, 2017

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in three cases yesterday: Rippo v. Baker, No. 16-6316: Petitioner Michael Damon Rippo moved to disqualify the Nevada state judge who presided over his criminal...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 2016 #7

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in three cases today: McDonnell v. United States, No. 15-474: Former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell and his wife, Maureen McDonnell, were federally indicted...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - March 2016

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in two cases on March 1, 2016: Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., No. 14-181: Respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, which has an “employee welfare benefit...more

The Volkov Law Group

The Over-Criminalization of Regulatory Compliance

The Volkov Law Group on

The Supreme Court is about to send another shockwave in criminal law. No one suspected that the Roberts Supreme Court would become a pro-defendant court but with the support of some conservative justices, the tide against...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide