News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States Judicial Proceedings

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Husch Blackwell LLP

Not So Fast: The Supreme Court of the United States Holds District Courts Should Not Dismiss Lawsuits Pending Arbitration

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) unanimously held that when a district court finds that when a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute and a party has requested a stay of the court proceeding...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Clauses: Key Takeaways for Companies

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court in Smith v. Spizzirri, 601 U.S. 472 (2024) and Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 144 S. Ct. 1186 (2024) provide important guidance for companies utilizing arbitration clauses in their...more

Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C.

Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Stay Requirement Under the Federal Arbitration Act

On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in Smith v. Spizzirri. This decision brings much-needed clarity to the proper procedure for federal courts, when dealing with cases involving...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Supreme Court Says Federal Courts Cannot Dismiss Suits Sent to Arbitration

Mandatory arbitration agreements remain popular for employers concerned about the cost, delays, and unpredictability of traditional litigation. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires federal courts to defer in most...more

Akerman LLP

The Supreme Court Ends Practice of Dismissing, Rather Than Staying, Lawsuits Compelled to Arbitration

Akerman LLP on

On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court unanimously decided in Smith v. Spizziri that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 3, divests federal district courts of any discretion to dismiss arbitrable claims that are...more

Carr Maloney P.C.

Federal Courts Must Grant Requests for Stays Pending Arbitration

Carr Maloney P.C. on

Last week, in Smith v. Spizzirri, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that a federal court must grant a party’s request for a stay while arbitration is pending. In Spizzirri, a group of delivery drivers sued...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Resolving Circuit Split, U.S. Supreme Court Says Courts ‘Shall’ Stay Cases Sent to Arbitration

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

“Shall” means “shall” in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held in Smith v. Spizzirri, No. 22–1218 (May 16, 2024). The Court explained the language in the FAA providing a court “shall on...more

FordHarrison

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Holds a Court Has No Discretion to Dismiss a Lawsuit Once It Compels a Case to Arbitration

FordHarrison on

Executive Summary: On May 16, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Smith v. Spizzirri, holding that federal district courts have no discretion under Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“the FAA”) to dismiss a case once...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Decides that Federal Courts Should Stay, Rather than Dismiss, Cases that Are Subject to Arbitration, If One...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided an issue concerning cases that are subject to arbitration that has divided the federal courts of appeals: when the claims at issue in a federal court suit are subject to arbitration, does...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Rules FAA Requires Courts to Grant Stay Requests After Compelling Arbitration

On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States held that when a federal district court determines that claims in a lawsuit are subject to arbitration and a party requests a stay, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)...more

McGlinchey Stafford

SCOTUS Unanimous: Order Compelling Arbitration Requires Court to Stay, not Dismiss Case

McGlinchey Stafford on

On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court unanimously held that when a district court compels claims to arbitration and a party has requested a stay under section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), the district court is...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

In Arbitration, Shall Means Shall

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The Supreme Court issued a decision Thursday in a case named Smith, et al. v. Spizzirri, et al., that has significant import for the franchise community. Many, if not the vast majority of, franchise agreements contain clauses...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Questions Whether FAA Allows Courts to Dismiss Lawsuits Sent to Arbitration

On April 22, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States conducted oral arguments in a case addressing federal courts’ handling of lawsuits after claims are compelled to arbitration. The Supreme Court seemed skeptical that...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Today’s Argument Was More Consequential Than Issued Opinions - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday morning in the case of Joseph Fischer, one of more than 300 people convicted of corruptly obstructing an official proceeding: the congressional certification on January 6, 2021, of...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Judicial Conference issues policy regarding random assignment of judges

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On March 12, 2024, the Judicial Conference of the United States (“Judicial Conference”) announced that, in an effort to limit the ability of litigants to select judges in certain cases based on where they file lawsuits, it...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Should I Stay or Should I Go: Supreme Court to Consider Whether Federal Courts Can Dismiss or Must Stay Cases Pending Arbitration

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On January 12, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Smith, et al. v. Spizzirri, et al., No. 22-1218 to consider whether a district court must stay a case — rather than dismiss it — when presented with an...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether Federal Courts Have Authority to Dismiss, Rather than Stay, Cases that Are Subject to...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide an issue concerning cases that are subject to arbitration that has divided the federal appeals courts: when the claims at issue in a federal court suit are subject to arbitration,...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court to Decide Whether District Courts Have the Discretion to Dismiss Cases Subject to Arbitration

Troutman Pepper on

Recently the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Smith v. Spizzirri, which presents the question of whether § 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires district courts to issue a stay pending...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

SUPREME COURT RULING: Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi et al, May 18, 2023

Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi et al, No. 21-757 (S. Ct. May 18, 2023) The Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision today concerning the enablement requirement found in Section 112 of the Patent Act. Specifically, the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Delivers the Final Blow to Amgen

The questions from the high court during oral argument at the end of March 2023 were fairly telling of the 9-0 ruling that came down yesterday in Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi (No. 21-757). In fact, it did not come as much of a...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Supreme Court Affirms Federal Circuit’s Decision in Amgen v. Sanofi

This morning, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Amgen v. Sanofi, a closely watched case concerning patent law’s enablement requirement. Under that requirement, codified at 35 U.S.C. § 112(a), a patent specification...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

4 Potential Paths For High Court In Amgen Patent Case

On March 27, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Amgen v. Sanofi, a closely watched case concerning the appropriate legal standard for patent law's enablement requirement. That requirement is found in Title 35...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

The Supreme Court Hears Arguments About the Enablement Standard in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Amgen v. Sanofi, the closely-watched case involving the enablement standard for patent claims, particularly as applied to functionally-defined genus claims. The question raised...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi Live Coverage

On Monday, March 27, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. EDT, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, No. 21-757. William H. Milliken, a director in Sterne Kessler’s Trial & Appellate Practice...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Docket Check: An Overview Of Key Criminal Cases The U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear This Term

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s new term begins with arguments on October 5, 2020, with the Court set to hear many important criminal law cases. Amidst the current national conversation about policing, the Justices will consider the...more

25 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide