News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States Navigable Waters

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Environment & Energy Insights (August 2024)

​Welcome to the August edition of Nutter’s Environment & Energy Insights, a monthly update of current trends in environment and energy law. This month we cover: EPA’s new Facility Response Plan requirements for potential...more

Mintz

EPA may avoid a nationwide injunction against its most recent WOTUS rule, but the rule is still in hot water.

Mintz on

Sam Hess of Inside EPA has a fulsome report on EPA's everything but the kitchen sink attempt to avoid a nationwide freeze of its most recent definition of Waters of the United States in litigation filed by a North Carolina...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Army Corps of Engineers Announces Post-Sackett Wetlands Protection Plans

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) on March 22, 2024, announced its plans for enhancing the protection of the country's wetlands following the U.S. Supreme Court's Sackett v. EPA decision. In Sackett, the Supreme Court...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Confronting Regulatory Fluidity in the Post-Maui and Post-Sackett World of Water Regulation

Both regulators and the regulated community must remain alert to accommodate the constantly changing regulatory scheme created in the post-Sackett world. The application of Maui and Sackett in recent months confirms the...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Waters of the United States/Clean Water Act: Federal Appellate Court Addresses Jurisdictional Challenge

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”) addressed in a December 18, 2023, Consolidated Opinion whether certain Louisiana wetlands were subject to Clean Water Act jurisdiction. See Lewis v....more

Foster Garvey PC

Understanding the Latest Federal Wetlands Rulings: A Guide for Property Owners and Developers

Foster Garvey PC on

Recent federal court decisions have changed the way wetlands are regulated in the United States. Here's what you need to know. A Shift in Wetland Regulation: The Sackett Decision and Its Impact In 2023, the U.S. Supreme...more

Mintz

An early Christmas present from three Fifth Circuit Judges who concluded a Louisiana property is not subject to Federal Clean...

Mintz on

Garry Lewis owns 2000 acres in Livingston Parish, Louisiana and he has been fighting with the Army Corps of Engineers over whether any of those 2000 acres are wetlands subject to Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction for over...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Does Discharged Groundwater Require a Clean Water Act NPDES Permit? U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Issues Draft Maui...

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is issuing for public comment draft guidance on applying the United States Supreme Court decision in County of Maui vs. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. EPA had previously...more

Goldberg Segalla

House Eyes New Version of the Clean Water Act in Response to Recent U.S Supreme Court Decision

Goldberg Segalla on

In what has already been a major year for the Clean Water Act, there’s now another attempt to redefine its scope. On October 17, the Clean Water Act of 2023 was introduced by ranking member of the House Committee on...more

Roetzel & Andress

Wrangling Continues over Revised WOTUS Conforming Rule Issued in Response to Sackett v. EPA

Roetzel & Andress on

On September 8, U.S. EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers published a final conforming rule amending the definition of “waters of the United States” in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Sackett decision....more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Revised WOTUS Rule Limits Reach of Clean Water Act

Following years of administrative rulemaking and litigation, on September 8, 2023, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) released a revision to the definition of waters of the United...more

Jenner & Block

EPA narrows “Waters of the United States” definition following Sackett ruling

Jenner & Block on

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers recently announced a revised and final rule amending the definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS) following the Supreme Court decision in Sackett v....more

Holland & Knight LLP

Waters of the United States Rule Revised in Response to Sackett Decision

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Aug. 29, 2023, issued a final rulemaking revising the definition of "Waters of the United States" (WOTUS) within Corps1 and EPA2...more

Maynard Nexsen

Is The WOTUS Carousel Finally Stopping Post-Sackett?

Maynard Nexsen on

On July 12, 2023, Shortly after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA and the Department of the Army issued a letter advising the ranking member of the Senate’s Committee on Environment...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

EPA and Army Corps Amend Clean Water Act’s “Waters of the United States” Rule

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a final rule revising the meaning of “waters of the United States” under the federal Clean Water Act (CWA). The revised...more

Snell & Wilmer

EPA Issues Emergency New Rule on Waters of the United States

Snell & Wilmer on

Using a rarely invoked exception to the Administrative Procedure Act’s requirement for public notice and comment prior to issuing a new rule, the EPA set forth a new rule governing jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Here We WOTUS Again

On Aug. 29, 2023, the Biden administration issued a prepublication version of yet another final Clean Water Act rule (“Conforming Rule”) revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) in response to the...more

Mintz

Instead of complaining about EPA's definitions of Waters of the United States, perhaps Congress might supply one of its own?

Mintz on

Sam Hess's report in Inside EPA paints a nuanced picture of the apparently never ending controversy over the reach of the Clean Water Act. I can't help but offer a few reactions....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Waters of the United States/Clean Water Act: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Corps of Engineers Final Rule Addressing Sackett...

The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Corps of Engineers (collectively “EPA”) issued a pre-Federal Register publication final rule on August 29th revising the Clean Water Act definition of...more

Goldberg Segalla

EPA Redefines ‘Waters of the United States’ to Conform with Supreme Court Decision

Goldberg Segalla on

On August 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced its final rule amending its definition of “waters of the United States.”  This new definition was written to conform with the Supreme Court’s May 24, 2023 ruling in...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Revised WOTUS Rule Limits Reach of Clean Water Act

On August 29, 2023, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) released a revision to the definition of water of the United States (WOTUS) that significantly curtails the agencies’ authority...more

Mintz

EPA & the Corps have published their 10th attempt to determine the reach of the Clean Water Act. Litigation is certain to follow.

Mintz on

Ahead of schedule, yesterday EPA and the US Army Corps of Engineers published their tenth attempt to specify the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act. The only question now is will its opponents file amended complaints in...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

US EPA and Army Corps Announce Final Rule Amending WOTUS

Bricker Graydon LLP on

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced a pre-publication version of their final rule amending the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) in response to the Sackett v. EPA...more

Sullivan & Worcester

Zoning and Development Newsletter - July 2023

Sullivan & Worcester on

Sullivan's Permitting & Land Use Practice Group and Litigation Department have released the second issue of their Zoning and Development Newsletter. The publication aims to provide our firm's clients and others interested...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Regulatory Changes: Massachusetts Wetlands Permitting

Goulston & Storrs PC on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued an opinion in Sackett v. EPA that established a stricter test for whether the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) applies to a wetland. The test limits federal jurisdiction to wetlands with a...more

192 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide