News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Non-Debtors

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Cranfill Sumner LLP

Supreme Court Sends Earthquake Through Bankruptcy Cases, Past, Present, and Future

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

The legal wrangling over Purdue Pharma, L.P.’s bankruptcy plan has been splashed over the news. In Purdue Pharma’s case, the reorganization plan called for Purdue Pharma to become a non-profit organization, while the Sackler...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Post-Purdue Pharma, Two Bankruptcy Courts Chime In on Preliminary Injunctive Relief for Nondebtors

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

For decades, bankruptcy courts have extended the automatic stay through preliminary injunctions halting litigation against a debtor’s nondebtor codefendants. Such relief was relatively routine when the codefendants were the...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Staying Litigation Against Insiders After Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024) (“Purdue”), the Supreme Court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize nonconsensual releases of nondebtors as part of a chapter 11 plan. The Court narrowly...more

Hogan Lovells

Optimizing Your Future (Part II): An Update After the Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Purdue

Hogan Lovells on

The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. – holding that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize the release of third-party claims against non-debtors in a reorganization plan without the...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Impact transfrontalier de la décision de la Cour suprême des États-Unis dans l’affaire Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP on

Le 27 juin 2024, la Cour suprême des États-Unis a publié une décision très attendue qu’elle a rendue dans l’affaire William K. Harrington, United States Trustee, Region 2, Petitioner v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. (l’« affaire...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Cross-Border Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States released its highly anticipated decision in William K. Harrington, United States Trustee, Region 2, Petitioner v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. (Purdue). At issue was...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Supreme Court Rejects Purdue Pharma’s Bankruptcy Plan

Rivkin Radler LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked a $6 billion bankruptcy settlement in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L. P., No. 23-124, 2024 WL 3187799, at *11 (U.S. June 27, 2024). The Court found that the Bankruptcy Code does...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court: No Nonconsensual Nondebtor Releases in Bankruptcy

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al., the U.S. Supreme Court held that nonconsensual releases of third-party claims against nondebtors are not authorized under the Bankruptcy Code, resolving a longstanding circuit...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Denies Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Purdue

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 27, 2024, in one of its most high-profile bankruptcy decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., No. 23-124, holding that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code does not authorize releases...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The Purdue Decision on Third Party Releases and Its Practical Implications

Paul Hastings LLP on

In a landmark decision that will significantly impact future reorganization plans, the Supreme Court categorically held in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., that bankruptcy courts lack the authority to approve nonconsensual...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

SCOTUS in Purdue: Non-Debtor Third-Party Releases Are Not Permitted in Chapter 11 Plans Without Consent

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court” or “Court”) rendered a 5-4 opinion in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. that “the [B]ankruptcy [C]ode does not authorize a release and injunction that, as...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Purdue Pharma: Supreme Court Prohibits Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases; Ruling Will Reshape Bankruptcy Practice

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

In a landmark 5-4 decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma that will significantly reshape corporate bankruptcy practice, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding the authority of a bankruptcy court to approve...more

Miller Canfield

In Purdue Pharma, Supreme Court Rules That Nonconsensual Releases Are A Nonstarter

Miller Canfield on

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., holding that the Bankruptcy Code does not permit nonconsensual releases of nondebtors. As a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Are Gate-keeper Provisions in Chapter 11 Confirmation Orders a Stopgap for Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

As many bankruptcy practitioners are aware, there is a circuit court split with respect to the allowability of non-consensual third-party releases. Notably, in the Purdue Pharma case, the United States Court of Appeals for...more

Hicks Johnson

Sackler Family’s Fate in the Supreme Court Is Poised to Transform Texas Bankruptcy Law

Hicks Johnson on

On December 4, 2023, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case that may have major implications for bankruptcy law in the Fifth Circuit. While the Fifth Circuit (along with the Ninth and Tenth Circuits) has held...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Gatekeeping Provisions in Chapter 11 Plans May Be Alternative to Nonconsensual Nondebtor Releases

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Nonconsensual nondebtor releases have been a key reason businesses facing mass tort claims have filed for bankruptcy. They hope chapter 11 will result in a faster, less expensive resolution of mass tort claims than class...more

White and Williams LLP

Third-Party Releases Possibly Headed To Scotus Following Purdue Pharma Plan Confirmation

White and Williams LLP on

The Second Circuit’s decision on May 30, 2023, to reverse the Southern District of New York’s (SDNY) decision and uphold the Bankruptcy Court approval of third-party releases in the Chapter 11 plan of Purdue Pharmaceuticals...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide