News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Social Media

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real...

The 2023 Term of the Supreme Court: Administrative and Regulatory Law Rulings

Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real... on

It is instructive to review the Supreme Court’s record in its most recent term, concentrating on regulatory and administrative law cases, which are usually back-burner issues. But not this term....more

Seward & Kissel LLP

Employment Litigation Roundup: August 2024

Seward & Kissel LLP on

In a win for employers, the Connecticut Supreme Court defines “supervisor” narrowly for purposes of vicarious employer liability under Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act - Under Connecticut’s civil rights law, an...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Keeping the Flame Alive: How IP Protects the Legacy of the Olympics

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Historically, the Olympic Games rank high as one of the most effective international marketing platforms in the world, reaching billions of people in more than 200 countries and territories across the globe. The International...more

Saiber LLC

The NetChoice Social Media Cases: Back to the Beginning

Saiber LLC on

​​​​​​​In a past Trending Law Blog post on November 1, 2023, we discussed how the Supreme Court of the United States granted petitions for certiorari in Florida’s NetChoice LLC v. Moody case and Texas’ NetChoice LLC v. Paxton...more

Pillsbury - Internet & Social Media Law Blog

In the Supreme Court’s NetChoice Rulings, the Court Leaves the Door Open for Future Social Media Content Moderation Regulations

Pillsbury - Internet & Social Media Law Blog on

Are social media companies more like newspapers or phone companies? This oft-debated question in social media legal circles, while seemingly trivial on the surface, represents a momentous debate over whether—and how...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Finds First Amendment Barriers to TX and FL Social Media Regulation

Perkins Coie on

On July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Moody v. NetChoice, LLC that laws regulating large social media platforms passed by Texas and Florida likely offend the First Amendment in at least some...more

Pillsbury - Internet & Social Media Law Blog

In Murthy v. Missouri, SCOTUS Focus on Plaintiff Standing Sidesteps Underlying, Larger First Amendment Questions

Pillsbury - Internet & Social Media Law Blog on

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision may have substantial effects on social media censorship. Based on their content-moderation policies, social media platforms have taken actions to suppress certain categories of speech,...more

Bilzin Sumberg

Supreme Court’s Social Media Ruling Tilts Toward Free Speech

Bilzin Sumberg on

The US Supreme Court this month declined to rule on whether Florida and Texas laws limiting social media platforms’ content moderation violates the First Amendment, sending the issue back to the lower courts. But in doing so,...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Clarifies First Amendment and Standing Standards Applicable to Social Media Content Moderation Policy Challenges

Snell & Wilmer on

Social media companies have long moderated the type of content that appears on a person’s home page by, for instance, deleting explicit posts or “downgrading” posts containing misinformation. Based on the belief that these...more

Hogan Lovells

Online Speech Showdown: Six Takeaways from Moody v. NetChoice

Hogan Lovells on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently released its decision in Moody v. NetChoice, providing some much-needed guidance to lower courts on the application of the First Amendment to laws regulating content moderation practices of...more

Clark Hill PLC

SCOTUS Remands Social Media Content Moderation Cases and Signals Content Moderation as a First Amendment-Protected Activity

Clark Hill PLC on

The First Amendment still imposes some limits on the government’s ability to control what content appears online. On July 1, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton,...more

WilmerHale

What's Next After Major First Amendment Win For Online Companies In Supreme Court's NetChoice Decision?

WilmerHale on

On July 1, the Supreme Court issued one of its most significant decisions regarding First Amendment rights on the internet in the NetChoice cases. At issue were a pair of facial First Amendment challenges to Texas and Florida...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

SCOTUS Reverses Ruling Limiting the Government's Communication with Social Media Companies

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP on

This past week, the United States Supreme Court held that two states – Missouri and Louisiana – and several private individuals did not have standing to obtain an injunction against the United States government to prevent the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Moody et. al., v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On July 1, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Moody et. al., v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC, v. Paxton, in which the Eleventh Circuit and Fifth Circuit Courts of Appeals had reached opposite decisions about a state’s...more

Carlton Fields

Top First Amendment Cases of the 2023-2024 Supreme Court Term

Carlton Fields on

The U.S. Supreme Court stepped back from the brink in a term that could have reshaped First Amendment law for the internet age. ...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 26, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions today: Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23-411: This case involves challenges to federal government communications with social media companies related to content...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Two Down, 12 to Go, and Two More Decision Days This Week - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The Supreme Court started yesterday with 14 decisions yet to deliver and only reduced the number by two—neither of them the Trump immunity case nor the Loper case concerning the future of the agency deference doctrine of...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Murthy v. Missouri

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 26, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23-411, holding that neither the individual plaintiffs nor the state plaintiffs established standing to seek an injunction prohibiting governmental...more

NAVEX

A Look at the Whistleblowers Who Made Lasting Impacts

NAVEX on

As seen in the previous article, whistleblowing cases regularly make the news headlines. And while some of the names of the reporters or the cases are well known, it’s worthwhile to take a closer look at the people behind the...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Supreme Court Addresses Social Media Usage by a Public Official

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

Lindke v. Freed, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 1214 (2024) (A public official who blocks someone from commenting on the official’s social-media page engages in state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only if the official both 1) possessed...more

Harris Beach PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Public Officials and Social Media

Harris Beach PLLC on

Public officials should proceed with caution when using social media. The United States Supreme Court, in a recent unanimous decision, articulated a two-part test to determine when a public official’s social media account...more

Cozen O'Connor

Bipartisan AGs Argue Section 230 Immunity for Online Platforms is Untenable “Engine of Human Misery”

Cozen O'Connor on

A coalition of 20 Republican and three Democratic AGs submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Doe v. Snap, Inc., No. 23-961, urging the Court to grant petitioner’s writ of certiorari and reverse the...more

Franczek P.C.

How to Identify State Action in the Context of Public Officials Using Social Media

Franczek P.C. on

Social media has given public officials the ability to share information quickly and easily with their constituents and followers, even on their own personal Facebook and other social media accounts. When using a personal...more

Clark Hill PLC

When Can Public Sector Employees Restrict Speech on Social Media? Supreme Court Weighs In

Clark Hill PLC on

James Freed, like millions of other Americans, maintained a private Facebook page where he posted updates about his personal life. After he became the City Manager for Port Huron, Michigan, Freed would occasionally post...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Anti-Social Media Behavior, Free Speech and Governmental Liability II –Supreme Court Ruling in Lindke v. Freed

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

In my prior article, I discussed Lindke v. Freed, in which a social media user brought action under § 1983 against a city manager, alleging that the manager violated the user’s First Amendment rights by deleting his comments...more

120 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide