News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Tax Liability

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Rivkin Radler LLP

Challenge to Collection Due Process? Will Supreme Court Affirm IRS’s Offset of Valid Refund With Disputed Tax Liability?

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Earlier this year the IRS announced that, as part of its larger compliance efforts begun last fall under the Inflation Reduction Act, the agency’s stepped-up enforcement activity with respect to high wealth, high income...more

Jones Day

U.S. Tax Court Invokes Loper Bright for the First Time

Jones Day on

The U.S. Tax Court allows a dividend-received deduction ("DRD") for a Section 78 gross-up while also disallowing foreign tax credits in its first application of Loper Bright....more

Alston & Bird

Supreme Court Holding Adds Complexity to Estate Planning

Alston & Bird on

Keeping it in the family just got more complicated. Our Tax Group studies a Supreme Court decision that left a family with an unexpected estate tax liability related to a share redemption agreement....more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Supreme Court Has Saved the Tax Code for Now and Left Room for Moore

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

In Moore v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax (MRT), saving a significant portion of the current tax code for now. The question in front of the Court was whether...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Supreme Court’s Non-Opinion On The “Realization” of Income – A Lost Opportunity?

Rivkin Radler LLP on

In less than four months, the citizens of the United States will be electing their next President to a four-year term. They will also be deciding which of the two major political parties will “control” the Senate, the House,...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Supreme Court Case Adversely Impacts Parties to Buy-Sell Arrangements

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States recently determined in Connelly v. U.S. that the value of a life insurance policy must be included in the fair market value of a closely held business for...more

BakerHostetler

[Podcast] Implications of Supreme Court’s Tax Decision in Moore v. United States

BakerHostetler on

A team of BakerHostetler lawyers, led by Partners Andrew Grossman and Jeff Paravano, represented clients Charles and Kathleen Moore at the Supreme Court, arguing that realization is required for federal taxation of income...more

Freeman Law

Supreme Court Upholds Section 965 Mandatory Repatriation Tax

Freeman Law on

On June 20, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Moore v. United States, in which a 7-2 majority upheld the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax (“MRT”) under section 965 of the...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Moore Thoughts: An Incremental Opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 20, 2024, ruled 7-2 that Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code, as revised by the law known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is constitutional. The issue presented to the Court in Moore v....more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Doing less with Moore: Supreme Court upholds section 965 transition tax in Moore v. United States

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Almost exactly a year after it shook the tax world by granting certiorari, on June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Moore v. United States, No. 22-800. By a vote of 7-2, the Court upheld the constitutionality...more

Gray Reed

SCOTUS Upholds MFT: Moore Et Ux v. US

Gray Reed on

On June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Moore et ux v. US, authored by Kavanaugh, decided by 6-3 vote and marking a rare instance for the Court to interpret the 16th Amendment, upholding the...more

Burns & Levinson LLP

Client Advisory: Repatriation Tax on Shareholders | Moore v. U.S.

Burns & Levinson LLP on

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 amended the law to introduce a new, one-time, mandatory repatriation tax on trillions of dollars of accumulations held abroad by American-controlled foreign entities. The tax is imposed on...more

Mayer Brown

Closely-Held Corporation Buy-Sell Arrangements Upended by Supreme Court in Estate of Connelly

Mayer Brown on

The Supreme Court has just weighed in on how gift and estate taxes apply with respect to non-cash gifts in Estate of Connelly v. United States. The Court’s opinion closely follows the economics of such arrangements, but...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Moore v. United States

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 20, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Moore v. United States, No. 22-800, holding that the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT) — a provision in a 2017 tax reform law — could constitutionally impose a one-time...more

Lewis Roca

Supreme Court Decision in Connelly v. United States

Lewis Roca on

On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in in Connelly, As Executor of the Estate of Connelly v. United States, (602 US ________). The decision involves the application of the federal estate tax...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Eager for Moore?

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

On December 5, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Moore v. United States, which is potentially the next landmark tax case on the meaning of income under the Sixteenth Amendment....more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Moore questions: Impressions from oral argument

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

On December 5, 2023, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. United States, addressing the constitutionality of the section 965 transition tax, which was enacted in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Section 965...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

A cautionary tale: Challenges for firms in Wayfair compliance

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

Law firms periodically receive requests for advice from CPAs regarding a client’s need to come into compliance with the relatively new and sometimes confusing “economic nexus” or “Wayfair” rules for selling goods or providing...more

K2 Integrity

Mitigating The Risks Of Introducing Name, Image, And Likeness Rights In College Athletics

K2 Integrity on

In the world of college athletics, the introduction of name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights on 1 July 2021 revolutionized the landscape for student-athletes, presenting new challenges and opportunities for student-athletes....more

Bilzin Sumberg

A Transition to What? SCOTUS Set to Decide the Fate of IRC 965

Bilzin Sumberg on

The U.S. Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) has decided to hear a case (Moore v. U.S., No. 22-800 ) where individual taxpayers owned shares in a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) and were subject to the so-called “transition tax”...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

Move Over TikTok, the Tax Man May Be Snooping on You, Too

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP on

In a rare unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court recently confirmed that existing law allows the IRS to probe your bank records, without ever notifying you. Under the applicable statute, the Court concluded the IRS is not...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court decided Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, No. 22-166, holding that, upon seizure of their real property for unpaid property taxes, the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S....more

Paul Hastings LLP

The IRS Can Obtain Your Bank Records Without Your Knowledge

Paul Hastings LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court rules that the IRS does not need to provide notice to innocent bank account holders when the summonses are issued in aid of collection of a delinquent taxpayer’s tax assessment. ...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Supreme Court Upholds IRS Collections Summons Without Notice

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The Supremes- The Constitution has figured prominently in the news of late. In the days preceding the initial discussions among members of the Administration and the Congressional leadership regarding the debt ceiling,...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Supreme Court Hands Taxpayers a Victory in FBAR Penalty Case

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Taxpayers recently won a significant victory at the Supreme Court in a penalty case involving a non-willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) under the Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”)....more

34 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide