News & Analysis as of

Summary Judgment Negligence

Rivkin Radler LLP

October 2024 New York Insurance Coverage Law Update

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The insured admittedly punched and threw the claimant to the ground, but the insured maintained during her plea for reckless assault in criminal court that the claimant was the aggressor, she acted in self-defense, and that...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

The Relation-Back Doctrine Under CPLR 203(c) and (f)

Freiberger Haber LLP on

It is well-settled that leave to amend a pleading is to be freely granted. Leave may be denied, however, if the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit, or if it would cause undue prejudice to...more

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

Federal Court Allows Ex-Teacher’s First Amendment Claim to Proceed to Trial

A jury will consider a former teacher’s (Mr. Moorehead) First Amendment claim against his former employer, a Pennsylvania School District (the “District”). The claim arose from Mr. Moorehead’s attendance at the “Stop the...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Cases to Watch: Gilead Life Sciences v. Superior Court

The California Supreme Court granted review in Gilead Life Sciences v. Superior Court—a hopeful turn of events after lower courts issued decisions that resulted in an unprecedented expansion of negligence liability for...more

Jones Day

California Supreme Court Will Review Novel Negligence Theory for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers

Jones Day on

The Situation: The California Supreme Court recently granted review of a California Court of Appeal decision, Gilead Life Sciences, Inc. v. The Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, that made waves in the...more

ArentFox Schiff

California Supreme Court to Review Newly Created Duty to Market a “Safer” Product Even in the Absence of a Defect

ArentFox Schiff on

On May 1, the California Supreme Court granted Gilead Science Inc.’s request to review a California appellate court’s holding that the pharmaceutical manufacturer must defend against negligence claims stemming from its...more

Tyson & Mendes LLP

Crash Course: Why Summary Judgment Misses the Mark in Illinois Multi-Cause Limousine Crash Collision

Tyson & Mendes LLP on

In Johnson v. Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, a limousine ride to the airport turned catastrophic when an unlicensed, speeding driver named Aaron Nash (“Nash”) missed a lane shift through a construction zone and...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Lawyers for the...

Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Default Judgment Against Attorney After He Repeatedly Fabricated Expert Witness Disclosures "From...

Iavor Stoyanov v. Himont Law Group, Ltd., et al., 2024 IL App (1st) 221434-U (April 15, 2024) - Brief Summary - The First District Appellate Court in Illinois held that the trial court (Judge Patrick J. Sherlock) was correct...more

White and Williams LLP

Subrogation Waiver Unconscionable in Residential Fuel Delivery Contract

White and Williams LLP on

In a matter of first impression, the Superior Court of Connecticut (Superior Court), in American Commerce Ins., Co. v. Eastern Fuel Corp., No. CV-206109168-S, 2024 Conn. Super. LEXIS 380, held that a waiver of subrogation...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

The Latest Major Developments in NC and SC Business Litigation

Employers in South Carolina faced with litigation might have an easier time winning motions for summary judgment, noncompete agreements remain in the crosshairs, and the North Carolina Supreme Court offered some rare how-to...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Lawyers for the...

Lack of Proximate Cause Dooms Plaintiff's Appeal of Adverse Summary Judgment

Flanigan v. Herman., 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 44 (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2024) - Brief Summary - The Washington Court of Appeals held that when the facts are undisputed, proximate cause is an issue of law to be decided by the...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Failure to Plead Fraud with Particularity, A “Single Shot Transaction” and the Lemon Law

Freiberger Haber LLP on

In today’s article, we examine Eva Chen Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. Recovery Racing IX, LLC, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 06511 (2d Dept. Dec. 20, 2023) (here), a case involving common law fraud, New York’s lemon law and Section 349 of New...more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

Understanding the Interplay of Punitive Damages and Direct Claims in Trucking Accidents

The recent case of Villagran v. Freightbull, Inc., No. 22-CV-2159 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 12, 2023, McHugh, J.) provides good case law for the trucking industry regarding the interrelatedness of claims for punitive damages and direct...more

Marshall Dennehey

Supreme Court Finds Distinction in Applicability of Law Enforcement’s Governmental Immunity

Marshall Dennehey on

Adesokan v. Town of Bloomfield, 347 Conn. 416, 297 A.3d 983 (2023) - This is a very interesting appeal involving whether a police officer holds a special defense of governmental immunity in the appellant’s underlying personal...more

Marshall Dennehey

The Delaware Superior Court Dismisses a Pedestrian’s Case in an Unavoidable Accident

Marshall Dennehey on

O'Neal v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. N22C-03-226 MAA, 2023 WL 4704684 (Del. Super. Ct. Jul. 21, 2023) - In a somewhat unusual case, the Delaware Superior Court found that the plaintiff’s negligence in crossing the street...more

Goldberg Segalla

Gasket Manufacturer Denied Summary Judgment in NYCAL

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this asbestos action, defendant Goodyear moved for summary judgment, arguing that asbestos exposure from its sheet gaskets could not have caused plaintiff Robert...more

Goldberg Segalla

Valve Manufacturer Denied Summary Judgment in NYCAL

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this asbestos action, defendant Crosby moved for summary judgment on duty to warn and causation grounds. Plaintiff Joseph Deroy opposed the motion....more

Goldberg Segalla

Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In three asbestos actions (Learmond, Nale, and Torio), a caulk defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that the respective plaintiffs’ claims regarding the asbestos...more

McGlinchey Stafford

What Is My Assumption of Risk? - McGlinchey Commercial Law Bulletin - September 11, 2023

McGlinchey Stafford on

Assumption of the Risk- Smith v. Be Fit with Michelle, LLC, 11th Dist. Lake, No. 2023-Ohio-3118. In this appeal, the Eleventh Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s decision to grant the defendant summary judgment...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Tank Rupture/Hazardous Materials Transportation Act: Federal Court Addresses Whether State Law Claims for Negligence/Strict...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (“Second Circuit”) addressed in an August 24th Opinion whether the federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (“HMTA”) preempted certain state tort law claims in...more

Marshall Dennehey

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division Affirmed Trial Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff on Issue of...

Marshall Dennehey on

Mei v. Cheung 187 N.Y.S. 3d 311, (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept. 2023) - The plaintiff was struck by the defendant’s vehicle as she crossed the street. Through deposition testimony, the plaintiff demonstrated that she crossed in the...more

White and Williams LLP

Pennsylvania Hospitals Provided a Path to Offset Ostensible Agent Liability

White and Williams LLP on

A recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision provided hospitals a path to offset liability for their ostensible agents’ negligence. In McLaughlin v. Nahata, the Court recognized that a defendant hospital could seek...more

Marshall Dennehey

Tractor-trailer Slamming Into Traffic Stopped Due to Prior Accident Was a “Foreseeable Byproduct” of Initial Accident, Barring...

Marshall Dennehey on

This highly interesting decision claims to be in line with our jurisdictions, but it appears to carve out additional liability, even in situations where the party seeking summary judgment is not the proximate cause of the...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Seventh Circuit Finds the Duty to Warn Can Extend to Packaging Manufactured by Another Company

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Can a company be found liable for failure to warn about hazards of another company’s product used in packaging for its own product?  What about when the company wasn’t warned that packaging could contain anything potentially...more

White and Williams LLP

In Pennsylvania, Contractors Can Be Liable to Third Parties for Obvious Defects in Completed Work

White and Williams LLP on

In Brown v. City of Oil City, No. 6 WAP 2022, 2023 Pa. LEXIS 681 (2023), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Supreme Court) recently held that a contractor can be liable for dangerous conditions it creates even if the hazard...more

124 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide