As we previously noted in this post, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed the Volkswagen Bondholder Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, with leave to amend, holding that it could...more
This case stems from alleged misstatement made by Volkswagen Group of America Finance (“VWGoAF”) in an Offering Memorandum governing the issuance of three sets of bonds. The bonds were offered in private placements with...more
5/25/2018
/ Bondholders ,
Bonds ,
Class Action ,
Direct Purchasers ,
Fraud-on-the-Market ,
Investors ,
Material Misstatements ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Private Placements ,
R&D ,
Rule 10(b) ,
Rule 144A ,
Scienter ,
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ,
Securities Exchange Act ,
Securities Fraud ,
Volkswagen