Latest Posts › Joint Employers

Share:

National Labor Relations Board Ends 2017 with a Flurry of Significant Decisions Reversing Recent Pro-Employee Precedents

Abandonment of Controversial Standards for Joint Employment and Review of Employer Policies Headline Slew of Changes - Since the election of President Trump, it has been a question of “when,” not “if,” the National Labor...more

NLRB Says Employer Consent Is Not Required for Bargaining Units of Solely and Jointly Employed Workers

In the U.S. National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) recent decision in Miller & Anderson, Inc., 364 NLRB No. 39 (July 11, 2016), the Board continued its expansion of the obligations of entities that do not directly employ...more

Department of Labor Guidance on Joint Employment Highlights Risks for Employers

In a recent OnPoint, Dechert discussed the National Labor Relations Board’s controversial decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., in which the Board abandoned its long-standing joint employer test in favor...more

National Labor Relations Board’s New Joint Employer Standard Expands Risks for Employers

In a potentially game-changing decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., a three-member majority of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) cast aside its long-standing joint employer test in favor...more

National Labor Relations Board’s Threatened Expansion of Joint Employer Doctrine Would Increase Employment Law Risks for US...

To bring their full financial and operational expertise to portfolio companies, private equity firms frequently adopt an active approach to overseeing their investments. However, the greater a firm’s involvement in the...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide