In a dispute over a traffic impact fee imposed on a residential building permit by El Dorado County, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected the long-standing position of California and other state courts that the Takings...more
In a major recent decision, the California Court of Appeal rejected a city’s interpretation of what constitutes an “objective” standard under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA), Government Code section 65589.5, and upheld...more
9/21/2021
/ Appeals ,
California ,
Civil Code ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Home Rule States ,
Housing Developers ,
Land Developers ,
Municipalities ,
Objective Standard ,
State and Local Government ,
Zoning Laws
In a 5-4 decision, the U. S. Supreme Court expanded the reach of the requirement that there be a “nexus” and “rough proportionality” between the impacts of a proposed development and governmental conditions imposed on the...more
6/27/2013
/ Dolan v City of Tigard ,
Fifth Amendment ,
Koontz v St John's River Water Management ,
Land Developers ,
Nexus ,
Nollan v California Coastal Commission ,
Permits ,
Rough Proportionality Test ,
SCOTUS ,
Takings Clause ,
Wetlands