The basis for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) is found in 35 U.S.C. § 101, establishing an applicant is entitled to a single patent, “a patent” or the “first” patent, for an invention....more
In a precedential opinion issued on April 11, 2024 in Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc., Nos. 22-2153, 23-1952, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for...more
4/26/2024
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
Applications ,
Carve Out Provisions ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Hatch-Waxman ,
Injunctions ,
Orange Book ,
Patent Applications ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Prior Art
Filing a continuation application from a parent patent is an implicit admission that obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) applies to the resulting continuation patent. A Terminal Disclaimer in the continuation patent over...more
3/20/2024
/ Double Patent ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Obviousness ,
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP) ,
Patent Applications ,
Patent Expiration ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Terms ,
Patents ,
Section 101 ,
USPTO
The duty to disclose required by 37 CFR § 1.56 is a constant weight on patent practitioners and applicants to cite references via an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS). The indiscriminate or reflexive filing of an IDS...more
On September 21, 2017, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) signed between the European Union (EU) and Canada provisionally entered into force in Canada. Among other things, this agreement seeks to harmonize...more
10/7/2017
/ Canada ,
Certificates of Supplementary Protection (CSPs) ,
CETA ,
Clinical Trials ,
EU ,
G7 ,
Patent Term Extensions ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Prescription Drugs