On January 1, 2025, new regulations governing Proposition 65’s so-called safe-harbor warnings went into effect.
Proposition 65 requires businesses that employ 10 or more persons to provide “clear and reasonable” warnings on...more
2/17/2025
/ California ,
Compliance ,
Consumer Protection Laws ,
Enforcement ,
Environmental Policies ,
Hazardous Substances ,
OEHHA ,
Product Labels ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Health ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Safe Harbors ,
State and Local Government ,
Toxic Chemicals
This post is part of MoFo’s 2025 Intersection of AI and Life Sciences blog series. In this blog series, we explore how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing research, innovation, and patient care in the life sciences....more
1/22/2025
/ Artificial Intelligence ,
Cybersecurity ,
Draft Guidance ,
Emerging Technologies ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Life Sciences ,
Medical Devices ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Risk Management ,
Software ,
Transparency
This post is part of MoFo’s 2025 Intersection of AI and Life Sciences blog series. In this blog series, we explore how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing research, innovation, and patient care in the life sciences....more
1/17/2025
/ Artificial Intelligence ,
Compliance ,
Draft Guidance ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Life Sciences ,
Machine Learning ,
Medical Devices ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Risk Management
On December 16, 2024, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) called for public comment on key issues related to the implementation of California’s two major climate disclosure bills, the Climate Corporate Data...more
12/23/2024
/ CARB ,
Carbon Emissions ,
Chamber of Commerce ,
Comment Period ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Covered Entities ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
Enforcement ,
First Amendment ,
Governor Newsom ,
Public Comment ,
Voluntary Disclosure
Courts around the country are grappling with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 generally shields online platforms from liability for content posted by third-party users, but courts are now deciding if...more
The Supreme Court of California is gearing up to decide an important question for the future of product liability law: Do drug manufacturers have a duty to innovate? In other words, does a manufacturer of a non-defective drug...more
Finally addressing costly mass arbitration concerns, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS) announced major changes to their arbitration rules. The updates aim to...more
Immersive technologies are at the forefront of innovation in the consumer technology and life sciences industries, but regulators are struggling to fit these devices, which blend clinical software with commercial headsets,...more
The California Supreme Court granted review in Gilead Life Sciences v. Superior Court—a hopeful turn of events after lower courts issued decisions that resulted in an unprecedented expansion of negligence liability for...more
6/14/2024
/ CA Supreme Court ,
Gilead Sciences ,
Healthcare ,
HIV ,
Liability ,
Life Sciences ,
Manufacturers ,
Negligence ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Product Defects ,
Summary Judgment
On April 15, 2024, in a big win for the continued validity of implied preemption, the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the First Circuit’s preemption-based dismissal of a proposed misbranding class action. The...more
Courts are increasingly being asked: is AI a product or a service? AI companies currently operate within an undefined products liability space. As companies continue to innovate with AI, courts must grapple with complicated...more