Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concluded that the TCPA’s definition of “automatic telephone dialing system” (or “ATDS”) includes all dialing equipment with the present ability to generate random or...more
6/22/2022
/ ATDS ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Cell Phones ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Debt Collection ,
Discovery ,
Facebook Inc v Duguid ,
Robocalling ,
SCOTUS ,
Summary Judgment ,
TCPA
As readers of this blog may recall, the Middle District of North Carolina recently denied Dish Network’s request for reversion of $11 million in unclaimed funds from the jury-awarded damages in a TCPA class action trial. See...more
Recently, the Northern District of California joined other courts in more closely scrutinizing class certification motions in TCPA cases. In a case involving an automated phone call by a loan servicer regarding Plaintiff’s...more
The Eleventh Circuit last week issued a common-sense ruling vacating class certification in a TCPA case—an area of the law where common sense does not always prevail. In Cordoba v. DIRECTV, LLC, No. 19-12077 (11th Cir. Nov....more
11/26/2019
/ Article III ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Decertification ,
DirectTV ,
Do Not Call List ,
FRCP Rule 23(b)(2) ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Predominance Requirement ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Remand ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Vacated
The Western District of Oklahoma recently granted a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against NorthStar Alarm Services, LLC (“NorthStar”) in a certified class action. The court held, in part, that NorthStar was...more