On January 30, 2019, the luxury jewelry suppliers Van Cleef & Arpels filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Nice Ice Fine Jewelers, LLC (“Defendant”). Van Cleef & Arpels’...more
3/27/2019
/ Attorney's Fees ,
Common Law Claims ,
Damages ,
Dilution ,
Fashion Branding ,
Fashion Design ,
Federal Trademark Register ,
Lanham Act ,
Likelihood of Confusion ,
Permanent Injunctions ,
Trade Dress ,
Trademark Infringement ,
Trademark Litigation ,
Trademark Registration ,
Trademarks ,
Unfair Competition
Under the first sale doctrine, once a trademark owner first authorizes its branded product to be sold to a consumer, the trademark owner’s right to control the further re-sale of that product is generally said to be...more
3/1/2019
/ Attorney's Fees ,
Consumer Confusion ,
Corporate Branding ,
Cosmetics ,
Damages ,
False Advertising ,
False Designation of Origin ,
Fashion Industry ,
FDA Approval ,
First Sale Doctrine ,
Gray Market Goods ,
Imports ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Lanham Act ,
Materiality ,
Product Packaging ,
Quality Control Plan ,
Tariff Act of 1930 ,
Tortious Interference ,
Trademark Exhaustion ,
Trademarks ,
U.S. Customs ,
Unfair Competition
On October 23, 2018, Rube P. Hoffman, a California textile manufacturer known for their Hawaiian prints and aloha shirts, filed a copyright infringement suit in the Central District of California against Zara USA, Inc., one...more
1/21/2019
/ Affirmative Defenses ,
Burden of Proof ,
Copyright Infringement ,
Copyright Ownership ,
Copyright Registration ,
Fair Use ,
Fashion Industry ,
Lanham Act ,
Manufacturers ,
Textiles ,
Unfair Competition
On October 19, 2018 plaintiffs CAR-FRESHNER Corporation (“CFC”) and Julius Sämann Ltd (“JSL”) filed suit against Balenciaga America, Inc. for alleged trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution,...more
Newcomer to the luxury cosmetics marketplace, Tatcha LLC (“Tatcha”), recently made a splash by filing a trade dress infringement lawsuit in the Northern District of California against Too Faced Cosmetics LLC (“Too Faced”), a...more
Trademark law is an important form of protection for the fashion and beauty industry. It protects both brand owners and consumers by regulating the registration of brands, or source identifiers, of fashion and beauty...more
7/25/2017
/ Disparagement ,
Fashion Branding ,
Fashion Industry ,
First Amendment ,
Free Speech ,
Government Speech Doctrine ,
Lanham Act ,
Matal v Tam ,
Redskins ,
SCOTUS ,
Trademark Registration ,
Trademarks
Does the use of Google AdWords amount to the advertising, promoting, marketing, or offering for sale of goods covered by a registered trademark? Tipsy Elves, LLC. vs. Ugly Christmas Sweater, Inc. is the latest in a string of...more
6/8/2017
/ AdWords ,
Consumer Confusion ,
Deceptive Intent ,
False Advertising ,
Fashion Industry ,
Google ,
Keyword Advertising ,
Lanham Act ,
Trademark Infringement ,
Trademarks ,
Young Lawyers
Airwair, the owner of the Dr. Martens brand, recently launched a series of lawsuits in the Northern District of California to enforce the trade dress of its “iconic boots and shoes.” One lawsuit was filed in October against...more
3/27/2017
/ Consent Order ,
Design Patent ,
Dilution ,
False Designation of Origin ,
Fashion Design ,
Fashion Industry ,
Inherently Distinctive ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Lanham Act ,
Permanent Injunctions ,
Secondary Meaning ,
Service Marks ,
Trade Dress ,
Trademark Infringement ,
Trademarks ,
Unfair Competition
On January 18, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding whether the Lanham Act’s provision refusing federal trademark registration to disparaging marks is invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First...more
2/10/2017
/ Appeals ,
Disparagement ,
Fashion Industry ,
First Amendment ,
Free Speech ,
Lanham Act ,
Lee v Tam ,
SCOTUS ,
Trademark Registration ,
Trademarks ,
USPTO