This OnPoint is the first in a series that will examine important trends and developments in class action litigation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Here, we look at the current litigation...more
11/20/2020
/ Article III ,
Breach of Duty ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Employee Benefits ,
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ,
ESOP ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
FIfth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer ,
Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma ,
Investment Management ,
Retirement Plan ,
Standing ,
Stock Drop Litigation ,
Thole v U.S. Bank
The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on August 7, 2020 issued its post-trial findings of fact and conclusions of law in Obeslo v. Great-West Capital Management, LLC et al. The ruling comes at the tail end of a...more
8/20/2020
/ Actual Damages ,
Breach of Duty ,
Burden of Proof ,
Calculation of Damages ,
Damages ,
Excessive Fees ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Gartenberg Factors ,
Investment Adviser ,
Investment Company Act of 1940 ,
Motion for Summary Judgment ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Post-Trial Order ,
Section 36(b) ,
Shareholder Litigation ,
Standing
Key Takeaways
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirms that comparison of advisory fees to subadvisory fees is “inapt” under Jones v. Harris Assocs., relying on undisputed evidence of differences in services and...more
4/3/2020
/ Appeals ,
Breach of Duty ,
Excessive Fees ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Gartenberg Factors ,
Investment Adviser ,
Mutual Funds ,
Reaffirmation ,
Section 36(b) ,
Shareholder Litigation ,
Summary Judgment
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a comprehensive post-trial ruling on September 30, 2019 in Chill v. Calamos Advisors LLC, holding that Plaintiffs failed to meet their burden to show that...more
10/10/2019
/ Breach of Duty ,
Burden of Proof ,
Dismissals ,
Excessive Fees ,
Expert Witness ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Gartenberg Factors ,
Investment Adviser ,
Investment Company Act of 1940 ,
Mutual Funds ,
Section 36(b)
The Chairman of the Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), on April 19, 2017 released an updated discussion draft of the Financial CHOICE1 Act (Bill), and the Committee held...more
5/1/2017
/ Breach of Duty ,
Burden of Proof ,
Clear and Convincing Evidence ,
Excessive Fees ,
Federal Pleading Requirements ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Gartenberg Factors ,
Investment Adviser ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Mutual Funds ,
Preponderance of the Evidence ,
Private Right of Action ,
Proposed Legislation ,
Section 36(b) ,
Shareholder Rights ,
Standard of Review
AXA Investor Fees Held Not To Constitute a Breach of Fiduciary Duty -
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey issued its trial ruling on August 25, 2016 in Sivolella v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance...more