Latest Posts › Vacated

Share:

Sublicense May Survive Termination of a Main License

FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. Before Dyk, Linn, and Taranto.  Appeal from the District of Delaware. Summary:  Contract interpretation must be applied in determining whether a sublicense survives...more

Missing Component Does Not Preclude a Prior Art Reference from Being a Primary Reference in a Design Case

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY v. GAMON PLUS, INC. Before Prost, Newman and Moore. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A proper primary reference can have slight differences in design if, in light of overall...more

Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Dyk, and Moore. Appeal from District of Delaware. Summary: A district court’s construction of a claim term that is contrary to the plain language of the claims and usage of the...more

Omaha Steaks International v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, O’Malley, and Stoll. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Advertising costs and sales figures are relevant in determining whether a trademark is famous and,...more

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Moore, and Reyna. Appeal from the District of Delaware. Summary: Plain language claim construction will not be narrowed based on the prosecution history unless the patentee...more

Nantkwest v. Iancu

Federal Circuit Summary - En Banc (excl. Chen), Opinion for the court filed by Stoll, joined by Newman, Lourie, Moore, O’Malley, Wallach, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District...more

Zeroclick, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Reyna, Taranto, and Hughes. Appeal from the Northern District of California. Summary: Failure to use the word “means” creates a rebuttable presumption that the term is not a...more

In Re: Durance

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Lourie, Reyna, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). Summary: Nothing in § 41.41(b)(2) bars a reply brief from addressing new arguments raised in the...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide