Today, in a 7-2 decision, the United States Supreme Court appeared to narrow the scope of the “in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security” as used in SLUSA. Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court...more
In This Issue:
*U.S. SUPREME COURT:
- Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317 (U.S. Nov. 15, 2013) Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. Nov. 12, 2013)
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, No....more
12/6/2013
/ Auditors ,
Certifications ,
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v Troice ,
Class Action ,
Derivative Suit ,
Dodd-Frank ,
Duty to Disclose ,
Enforcement Actions ,
Facebook ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Foreign Corporations ,
Fraud ,
Halliburton ,
Halliburton v Erica P. John Fund ,
Misrepresentation ,
Pleading Standards ,
Ponzi Scheme ,
PSLRA ,
Scienter ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ,
Securities Exchange Act ,
Securities Fraud ,
Standing ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Statute of Repose
Gabelli v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, No. 11-1274 (U.S. Feb. 27, 2013) -
In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court today held that the five-year limitations period that governs SEC...more
Today, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds that a securities fraud plaintiff alleging fraud on the market need not establish the...more
2/27/2013
/ Amgen Inc. v Connecticut Retirement Plans ,
Burden of Proof ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
False Statements ,
Fraud-on-the-Market ,
Insider Trading ,
Materiality ,
Pleadings ,
Rule 10b-5 ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities Fraud