In a recently unsealed opinion, a court in the District of New Jersey has declined to certify a direct-purchaser class in In re Lamictal ("Lamictal") on numerosity grounds. It joins the growing number of courts in recent...more
In a recent decision denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss, Judge Mitchell Goldberg of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania allowed the manufacturer of a generic version of Suboxone to proceed upon an interesting theory...more
1/10/2017
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
Anti-Competitive ,
Antitrust Litigation ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Generic Drugs ,
Monopolization ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Prescription Drugs ,
Product Hopping ,
REMS ,
Sherman Act
It has been over three years since the Supreme Court’s Actavis decision. Since then, numerous putative class actions alleging harm to competition as a result of “reverse-payment” settlements have flooded the courts. The...more
11/10/2016
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
Actavis Inc. ,
Anti-Competitive ,
Antitrust Violations ,
Appeals ,
AstraZeneca ,
Class Action ,
Exclusivity ,
Generic Drugs ,
Hatch-Waxman ,
Nexium ,
Patents ,
Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements ,
Summary Judgment ,
Teva Pharmaceuticals
It is not every day that antitrust plaintiff classes fail to win certification due to lack of numerosity under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(1). Yet this week, absence of numerosity was the reason a Third Circuit...more