On February 26, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, holding that, for purposes of ERISA’s three-year statute of limitations, a plan beneficiary does not have “actual...more
2/28/2020
/ Actual or Constructive Knowledge ,
Appeals ,
Breach of Duty ,
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma ,
Material Disclosures ,
Question of Fact ,
Reaffirmation ,
Retirement Plan ,
Retirement Plan Beneficiaries ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Split of Authority ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Summary Judgment
On February 25, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Monasky v. Taglieri, holding that the determination of a child’s “habitual residence” for purposes of the Hague Convention depends on a totality-of-the-circumstances...more
2/27/2020
/ Appeals ,
Child Abduction ,
Child Custody ,
Clear Error Standard ,
Custody Agreements ,
Domestic Violence ,
Expedited Actions Process ,
Habitual Residence ,
Hague Convention ,
Italy ,
Monasky v Taglieri ,
Petition for Return of Child ,
Question of Fact ,
Reaffirmation ,
SCOTUS ,
Split of Authority ,
Standard of Review ,
Totality of Circumstances Test ,
United States ,
Wrongful Removal