Seyfarth Synopsis: In deciding to deny certiorari to review Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 17-806 (U.S. 2017), the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to reconsider the standing principles it announced in its landmark 2016 Spokeo...more
1/24/2018
/ Article III ,
Background Checks ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Petition for Writ of Certiorari ,
SCOTUS ,
Screening Procedures ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing
Seyfarth Synopsis: In deciding Spokeo v. Robins, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that plaintiffs seeking to establish that they have standing to sue must show “an invasion of a legally protected interest” that is...more
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari on April 27, 2015 in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 13-1339, the Petitioner has weighed in with their brief.
As you may recall, the question before the Court has the...more
8/12/2015
/ Article III ,
Cause of Action Accrual ,
Certiorari ,
Class Action ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
FDCPA ,
Internet ,
Online Reputation ,
Putative Class Actions ,
SCOTUS ,
Spokeo ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing ,
Statutory Rights ,
TCPA