The prospects for and the effect of a comprehensive federal data privacy act remain uncertain. There are no indications that any comprehensive federal data privacy act will be considered by Congress this year, and questions...more
“More needs to be done to create a safe online space for children to learn, explore, and play.”
This was the unanimous finding of the California legislature in 2022, and, since that time, other stakeholders have...more
To say that class action litigation regarding the use or collection of “biometric information” – such as fingerprints, face records, or voice records – is expensive would be a gross understatement. The damages sought, and...more
In Illinois, the Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) regulates the collection and use of “biometric information” such as fingerprints, facial images, and voice records. It imposes significant penalties and has...more
Is your business using or thinking of using facial recognition technology for activities in Portland, Oregon? Think again.
That’s the message to businesses operating in Portland in a new ordinance that broadly bans the...more
In three cases this term, the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed the freedom of religious institutions to access government benefits and to make employment decisions....more
7/15/2020
/ Administrative Authority ,
Age Discrimination ,
Compelling Governmental Interest ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Employment Discrimination ,
Espinoza v Montana Department of Revenue ,
Establishment Clause ,
First Amendment ,
Free Exercise Clause ,
Freedom of Religion ,
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v Pennsylvania ,
No Aid Clause ,
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v Morrissey-Berru ,
Religious Discrimination ,
Religious Schools ,
Remand ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
State Constitutions ,
Strict Scrutiny Standard