Latest Posts › SCOTUS

Share:

SCOTUS grants cert. to determine whether an appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration automatically stays district...

Takeaway: To control litigation risk, a business might include an arbitration clause and class action waiver in its consumer-facing terms and conditions. When a consumer files a putative class action against that business,...more

SCOTUS displays short memory in rejecting the prejudice requirement for waivers of the right to arbitrate

Takeaway: In Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., --- S. Ct. ----, No. 21-328, 2022 WL 1611788 (May 23, 2022), the Supreme Court rejected the arbitration-specific rule requiring a finding of prejudice for a waiver of the right to...more

SCOTUS to decide whether FAA preempts California’s prohibition on the arbitration of PAGA representative claims

We have written a number of articles about California’s restrictions on arbitration agreements, including California’s “McGill rule,” which provides that arbitration agreements cannot waive claims for “public injunctive...more

SCOTUS standing ruling – “No concrete harm, no standing” – sidesteps class action issues and could limit federal subject matter...

Takeaway: In TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, --- S. Ct. ----, No. 20-297, 2021 WL 2599472 (June 25, 2021), the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the question of “[w]hether either Article III or Rule 23 permits a damages...more

SCOTUS grants certiorari to resolve critical class action standing issue

Takeaway: In a prior article – Class action standing: Ninth Circuit holds members of a damages class must demonstrate Article III standing (March 31, 2020) – we discussed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Ramirez v....more

SCOTUS declines review of Second Circuit ruling endorsing class arbitration

Takeaway: The concept of class arbitration has endured stiff headwinds. In Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varella, 139 S. Ct. 1407 (2019), the Supreme Court ruled that a party cannot be required to participate in a class arbitration...more

What the Lamps Plus court did not say about class arbitration

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varella, No. 17-988, 2019 WL 1780275 (U.S. Apr. 24, 2019), a lot of ink has been spilled on the issue of class arbitration.  The Lamps Plus majority,...more

SCOTUS punts in cy pres only class settlement case remanding on Spokeo standing issue

As we predicted in a January 2019 post [Cy pres-only class settlements – anticipated Supreme Court decision may never come to pass], the United States Supreme Court, in a closely-watched case, declined to rule on the fairness...more

Arbitration Justice Kavanaugh eliminates wholly groundless exception to delegation clauses

Takeaway: Justice Kavanaugh’s first Supreme Court opinion is yet another High Court reminder that, when it comes to arbitration, the contract controls. If parties agree that an arbitrator should resolve the “gateway” issue...more

U.S. Supreme Court puts class action doubleheader on the calendar – cy pres awards and class arbitration

Takeaway: On April 30, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in a Ninth Circuit case approving a cy pres-only class action settlement. As we reported in a May 2018 post [U.S. Supreme Court puts class action doubleheader...more

U.S. Supreme Court puts class action doubleheader on the calendar – cy pres awards and class arbitration

On April 30, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in two class action cases, on issues involving cy pres awards and class arbitration. Both cases arise out of the Ninth Circuit. The Supreme Court’s decision in the cy...more

The Spokeo Saga Continues: Ninth Circuit Finds That Incorrect Consumer Report About Age, Marital Status, Wealth, Education Level,...

Takeaway: In Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016) (“Spokeo II”), the Supreme Court ruled that not every statutory violation gives rise to a concrete injury for standing purposes. An inaccurate report of a person’s...more

Supreme Court Rules that Bare Statutory Violation without Other Concrete Harm Cannot Provide Federal Court Standing

On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Spokeo v. Robins, No. 13-1339, which presented the question of whether a plaintiff has standing in federal court to assert a claim where the only...more

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Pick-Off “Offer” to Class Representative Does Not Moot Claim, But Pick-Off “Payment” Might Succeed

“Picking-off” a named class representative is a class action defendant’s dream. Faced with a class action in which the named plaintiff seeks a small recovery on an individual basis but an enormous recovery on a class basis,...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide