Morrison Foerster has long championed the advancement of women. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization struck down 50 years of precedent that MoFo lawyers, on behalf of our...more
On September 12, 2023, MoFo litigation partner and co-chair of the Employment & Labor Group and the Women’s Strategy Committee, Tritia Murata, along with Jamie Levitt, managing partner of MoFo’s New York office, hosted a...more
The Supreme Court has just given companies looking to go public another reason to do it through direct listings.
The federal securities laws impose strict liability for misleading statements made in connection with...more
Pending before the Second Circuit is a unique (and apparently sua sponte) application of the jurisdictional test announced by the Supreme Court in Morrison v. Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., to dismiss non-securities state law...more
6/7/2021
/ Breach of Contract ,
Cryptocurrency ,
Extraterritoriality Rules ,
Initial Coin Offering (ICOs) ,
Investment Contract ,
Morrison v National Australia Bank ,
Popular ,
Pump and Dump ,
Securities Act of 1933 ,
Securities Exchange Act ,
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Over the past several years, companies conducting public offerings have increasingly been subject to parallel shareholder class actions under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 brought in both federal and state courts. ...more
If your company is involved in selling products or services to consumers in New Jersey over the web or through mobile apps, you’ll want to read this blog post....more
7/20/2016
/ Class Action ,
Consumer Contracts ,
Consumer Fraud ,
E-Commerce ,
Internet Retailers ,
Mobile Apps ,
NJ Supreme Court ,
Savings Clause ,
Spokeo ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Terms and Conditions ,
Warranties ,
Websites
On May 5, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided City of Pontiac v. UBS AG, affirming the dismissal of a securities fraud complaint against UBS and holding that the Supreme Court's decision in Morrison...more