Latest Publications

Share:

Textualism Is More Than Dictionaries: The Supreme Court's Latest Clean Water Act Decision Looks to History and Context

When it rains too much in San Francisco, the city's wastewater treatment plant can get overloaded. An overloaded wastewater treatment plant means that a city-operated, EPA-permitted point source in the Pacific Ocean could...more

Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of FCC's Universal Service Subsidies Under the Nondelegation Doctrine

Another major shift in the role of executive administrative agencies and congressional delegations of power to agencies may be on the way. ...more

Whither the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA Regulations? A Clear-Eyed Perspective

For those of you who still haven't heard, in a surprising 2-1 ruling, the D.C. Circuit held that the Council on Environmental Quality had no legal authority to issue its regulations governing federal implementation of NEPA....more

Environmental Law in a Post-Chevron World

Last week, Venable’s Government Division offered its general thoughts on the fallout from the Supreme Court’s reversal of the long-standing Chevron deference principle. Here, the Environmental Practice Group offers some of...more

Supreme Court Overrules Chevron: Agency Deference in Flux

In a monumental opinion issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overruled Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., holding (6-3) that deference to an agency's...more

NEPA at the Supreme Court

Does the National Environmental Policy Act require an agency to consider environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of actions within the agency's jurisdiction? That's the question that the U.S. Supreme Court has...more

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Phase II Regulations Are Here - "Much Ado About Nothing"?

Based on immediate reactions to the long-awaited final "Phase II" NEPA regulations, one might think that the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) substantially altered long-standing federal environmental review practice....more

Explaining What "and" Means

Everyone knows what "and" means. "And" is not a word you have to look up. So why did the use of "and" in a criminal sentencing statute divide the U.S. Supreme Court? Because the statute's grammatical structure allowed "and"...more

4/3/2024  /  SCOTUS , Sentencing

Plain Meaning or Precedent? Why Not Both?

Imagine you're crafting an argument in an appellate court. The key statute has language that favors you, but a decades-old Supreme Court case goes the opposite way. Or, from the other side, the case is favorable but the...more

When International Shoe Doesn't Fit: Personal Jurisdiction After Mallory v. Norfolk Southern

Every first-year law student learns two ways that a court can have jurisdiction over a corporate defendant. If the defendant has "minimum contacts" with a state, and the plaintiff's injuries arise out of those contacts, then...more

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Supreme Court Gives Arbitrability Appeal Automatic Stay

Every day, untold thousands get online to buy goods, book services, or sell something. And almost without fail, they are greeted with a Terms and Conditions pop-up. Then, perhaps the most common human experience of the...more

[Webinar] The Future of Chevron Deference and Administrative Law - June 29th, 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET

On the surface, a dispute over whether small fishing businesses should be required to pay for onboard monitors to observe their catch would not appear to be a potential game-changer for administrative law. But when the...more

NEPA Amendments: Highlights and Practical Implications

The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 most notably raised the debt ceiling. But the legislation also made substantive changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), with an eye toward simplifying and streamlining...more

Sackett v. EPA: What's Next for Clean Water Act Jurisdiction?

Clean Water Act practitioners have spent the past 50 years learning how to identify a wetland or water body that qualifies for federal jurisdiction—and the past 17 parsing the phrase "significant nexus." The upshot was that...more

Could Texas Ban the Sale of Union-Made Goods? After National Pork Producers, We Still Don’t Know

The Supreme Court’s opinion last week in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross raises more questions than it answers regarding what state laws might violate the dormant Commerce Clause. California prohibits the in-state...more

EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers Revise the Definition of WOTUS

Just before the crystal ball dropped in Times Square on New Year's Eve, the U.S. EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers made available a pre-publication copy of their final revised definition of "waters of the United States"...more

Clean Water Act Wetlands Jurisdiction: Could Adjacency Be the New "Significant Nexus"?

​​​​​​​The U.S. Supreme Court's October 2022 term began with a bang: a new Justice on the bench, the public back in the courtroom for the first time since the pandemic - and two hours of argument about the scope of federal...more

Text, Context, and Canons: Inside a Unanimous Supreme Court Decision

The end of the Supreme Court's term usually brings divided decisions. But in Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, the whole Court agreed on both the result and the reasoning in a trim 11 pages....more

Grammar, Meet Jurisdiction

When Boechler v. Commissioner was argued, I wrote about how the statute in the case presented several grammar and usage quandaries. Now, the Supreme Court has unanimously agreed: The statute's text is a mess....more

When Do Courts Prefer Ordinary Meaning to Categorical Rules?

The statute sounds simple. A criminal defendant faces enhanced penalties if he has previously been convicted of three felonies committed on "occasions different from one another." But the defendant in Wooden v. United States,...more

SCOTUS and WOTUS: Is Sackett Case the Final Chapter?

On January 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on a fundamental environmental law question that has lingered for several decades - what is the appropriate definition of "waters of the United States" (WOTUS) in...more

Should Your Lawyer Be a Grammar Nerd?

Sometimes, yes. At least that’s one takeaway from the argument in a recent U.S. Supreme Court case, Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. ...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide